Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Very true but all the more reason to avoid the extravagant claims and > bluster which was so obvious in earlier postings by Defkalion to their > forum -- around June of this year. Perhaps you missed those? Things like > having dozens of reactors under test, varying outputs up to 35kW, > submissions to the Greek authorities for tests already underway and to be > completed Q4, and on and on . . . >
How do you know these are extravagant claims? Do you have some inside information? Do you know someone who visited and saw no evidence for these things? If these claims were true then they were not bluster. We don't know yet. At least, I don't. If you do not have inside information, then you are making unfounded assertions about a company you know nothing about. Such assertions are not welcome here. It is fine to say "I suppose these claims are bluster" but unless you have evidence please refrain from asserting that as an unqualified fact. - Jed
