On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of >> Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. > > > He may have said that, but we do not have a content policy.
I wonder why he said that. Perhaps it was true in the past but the content policy has been since been dropped. ;-) > >> >> They have said they prefer to include papers in the library which >> will raise the credibitily and respectability of the field ( and I >> don't just mean they prefer nicely formated papers without >> spelling mistakes). > > > We have uploaded papers attacking the field, by leading skeptics such as > Steve Jones. So that can't be true. > > Here is his paper: > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JonesSEchasingano.pdf > > We have also uploaded a large number of papers that I personally think have > no scientific merit. They range from really bad to nonsense. And no, I will > not say which ones I think are garbage. The readers can decide. I am not a > gatekeeper. > > By the way, if there is a spelling mistake, I correct it. > > >> >> Based on my reading of Swartz anything that smacks of >> pandering makes his stomach turn so he views the policy as >> politically motivated censorship. > > > It might smack of pandering if there was any truth to it, but anyone looking > at the papers in the library can see it is nonsense. > > - Jed So you now allow papers that are not faithful to the commandments of physics? harry
