On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not so much proven lies as it is constant inconsistencies, vagueness, > tangential answers to obviously relevant and harmless questions, spouting > off about snakes and clowns, and general avoidance of credible answers. In > a recent post on Moletrap, Alsetalokin again raises the issues. Here are a > few he mentions ( here: > http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2292&page=32#Comment_163596 > ) > > "First there are gammas, then there are no gammas, then there are. First the > COP is 20 or more, then it's six, then it's three or less. First there's a > lot of lead, then the lead isn't necessary, then it's the main way heat is > produced from the gammas. He has always said that there are gamma rays. He shields them with lead. There are no gamma rays leaving the device. This is all consistent. The COP can be either 20 or 6 or whatever he chooses. This is an arbitrary number determined by his ability to keep the reaction stable. This is consistent. If he said that the lead wasn't necessary, then that may be an inconsistency, but I didn't see him write that. If you can remember where it was, please post the link -- not that this really matters. The only thing that will matter is when and if Rossi starts selling more of these devices. But the more I read Rossi, the more consistent his actions are appearing to me to that of an engineer trying to deliver a new product. If you're looking for some world-revealing epiphany, you're not going to find it from him. That is not something he will deliver. Perhaps, last year, he was pondering some sort of independent test, but I think that fell apart when his deal with Defkalion fell apart. A business strategy is always a work-in-progress. Craig
