On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Chemical Engineer <[email protected]> wrote:
> With an 8 million times chemical > potential I think we should all agree and rename the technology "Low > Efficiency Nuclear Reaction"... > > Just having fun, don't flame me... Or possibly IENR for a reaction which requires no input but provides output. (Ignore that liquid flowing under your feet.) T <striking match, little input energy but large heat energy :-) >
