EL,

Look I still believe the E-Cat is a workable FPE device. BUT it needs a LOT of work by good engineers. I don't see that happening as Rossi appears to be holding the IP VERY close to his chest. This product needs a really good team of experienced development engineers. Not just NI. Thermal heat management, flow dynamics, industrial design, design for manufacture, design for repair (needed for a 30 year life as it will break several times over that time period) and other design, manufacturing and engineering specialists.

What we saw in that video was Rossi and one other person working on a Fat E-Cat and a prototype home E-Cat with a home sized heat exchange on wooden boxes / tables in one corner of a room.

Sorry but not what I would expect but maybe I'm wrong. Or what we saw was a back yard / garage science project being run by 2 people.

Andrea Rossi please stop talking about heating your FACTORY with E-Cat heat and doing videos wearing a thick coat. Mate, trust me, it doesn't look good.

I still believe you have something of value. But your PR is killing you and your product.

Under promise and over deliver. Remember the 3 Qs. QUALITY of product, QUALITY of expectation delivery, QUALITY of support and service. Deliver those 3 Qs and price is the last issue.

AG


On 19/01/2012 11:45 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
I agree. It does look as though Rossi is being contradictive in his
statements. Maybe we should just ask him directly. I bet ecat.com didn't
post that interview now. Look at the can of worms it's opened.


Reply via email to