some proposition that you may comment... maybe I'm naive. Whether as some says, heat is stored in thermal mass, the steam generated should be superheated, thus dry ?
if steam/water is under high pressure to store or avoid boiling, when it exit it should be superheated, thus dry ? wet steam need either a careful mix of water and generated superheated steam, or generation from not so hot, not so powerful thermal source (like undersized boiler), at atmospheric pressure also one cannot see dry steam ? it is invisible ? you only see the droplets, or at most the condensation in cold air, far away, if not so superheated. thus the only possibility of fake according to critical comments is that the electric heater make the water slowly boil. please correct me, but with correction! 2012/1/21 John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> > I suppose my coffee maker could be producing "dry" steam. But it's > producing very small quantities of it, and that small amount of steam > pushes the vast majority of the liquid water up and over the reservoir and > into the coffee grounds. > > Or am I missing something? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:55 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on > Rossi blog > > Uh Shaun, wet steam is physical impossibility. All water boilers on Earth > produce 99-95 dry steam, including Krivit's water boiler. You need to go > high pressures and high steam velocities in order to produce stable wet > steam. So please, at least you should get the basic physics right. > —Jouni > On Jan 21, 2012 1:25 PM, "Shaun Taylor" <shauntaylor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 21/01/2012 9:28 PM, John Milstone wrote: > > For what it's worth, here are the relevant links I have on Rossi's > claims of having been working with the University of Bologna... > > June 18, 2011, Rossi says, "In these days, together with the > University of Bologna and with my Customers, we have made tests > measuring not only dry steam, but also with really , really, REALLY > high performances: they know, I know, we know. That’s enough." > (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=21#comment-47001) > > > Dry steam with really high performance Rossi said???? Well when Krivit > made his visit and video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E on 14 > June 2011, the steam was very, very, VERY wet and not coming out in the > volume or speed one would expect from turning 7 kg of water into steam > every hour. 11:30 in the video. > > Something must have really, really, REALLY changed in 4 days. > > Maybe Rossi thinks Prof Levi and Prof Focardi working privately in his > laboratory is the same thing as the University of Bologna doing the work. > That was until the University made it VERY clear they had never officially > done any work for Rossi and this would not happen until he paid them what > he had agreed to pay them. As we know, that did not happen. > > So Rossi is caught out in yet another lie. Yea I know, just another > translation error. > > Shaun > > > >
