That is absurd – John. Do you have any depth of understanding on this test, since you seem to be coming in after all of these details have been hashed and rehashed ad nauseum ?
These were not merely “guests” dragged in off the campus - Dozens of PhD level scientists were there. Are they all in on this with Rossi? Did they take his word for it? I think not. Your assertion is laughable really. A good magic show can fool a few journalists and grad students and yes, Levi does not inspire confidence – but take a closer look at the “guests”. BTW your “return” setting for this group is in error as it defaults to your personal address From: John Milstone If you trust Rossi, then you might as well accept the numbers presented by the unknown consultant of the secret company. If you don't trust Rossi, then there is absolutely nothing from the October 28th test to indicate that the "MegaWatt" E-Cat even got slightly warm (AFAIK), with or without the generator running. Did any of the guests notice any radiant heat from either the shipping container or the big heat exchanger? Did anyone notice atmospheric heat distortion immediately above the heat exchanger? I don't recall reading any such things (but I could have missed something). It's a shame that no one thought to bring an infrared heat sensor (the type used to detect heat escaping from doors and windows in a home). That might have provided very useful data on just how hot the various parts of the device actually got, even though Rossi prevented any direct measurements. From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 9:00 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog There is still the nagging question of “was the power turned off or not?” due to the genset still running - but any practical person would have to conclude there is a good case for a gigantic thermal anomaly for many hours. Yet there is no real proof and any “customer” who thinks there was satisfactory proof for a large investment - is not getting good technical assistance.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
