Jones, I am confused. I thought you considered the 1MW as a fake given your criticisms over the non delivery of the 1MW generator.
2012/1/21 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > That is absurd – John. > > Do you have any depth of understanding on this test, since you seem to be > coming in after all of these details have been hashed and rehashed ad > nauseum ? > > These were not merely “guests” dragged in off the campus - Dozens of PhD > level scientists were there. Are they all in on this with Rossi? Did they > take his word for it? > > I think not. Your assertion is laughable really. > > A good magic show can fool a few journalists and grad students and yes, > Levi > does not inspire confidence – but take a closer look at the “guests”. > > BTW your “return” setting for this group is in error as it defaults to your > personal address > > > From: John Milstone > > If you trust Rossi, then you might as well accept the numbers presented by > the unknown consultant of the secret company. > > If you don't trust Rossi, then there is absolutely nothing from the October > 28th test to indicate that the "MegaWatt" E-Cat even got slightly warm > (AFAIK), with or without the generator running. > > Did any of the guests notice any radiant heat from either the shipping > container or the big heat exchanger? Did anyone notice atmospheric heat > distortion immediately above the heat exchanger? I don't recall reading > any > such things (but I could have missed something). > > It's a shame that no one thought to bring an infrared heat sensor (the type > used to detect heat escaping from doors and windows in a home). That might > have provided very useful data on just how hot the various parts of the > device actually got, even though Rossi prevented any direct measurements. > > > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 9:00 AM > Subject: RE: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi > blog > > There is still the nagging question of “was the power turned off or not?” > due to the genset still running - but any practical person would have to > conclude there is a good case for a gigantic thermal anomaly for many > hours. > Yet there is no real proof and any “customer” who thinks there was > satisfactory proof for a large investment - is not getting good technical > assistance. > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
