Shaun please note also how far from the heat exchanger was placed the Tin probe. Even before the flow meter! Why ?
2012/1/23 Shaun Taylor <[email protected]> > On 23/01/2012 6:14 PM, Jojo Jaro wrote: > > > >> Shaun, you are in error. I have examined your pictures and like Mary, I >> do not see the significance of the goop you are referring to. BUT ... >> For the sake of discussion, I accept your premise that the goop was >> placed there so that Tout can be higher than it would have been. >> > > First point, Jed was not there. > > Ok so lets move forward on the assumption Rossi had placed the sensor to > generate a higher than reality Tout. > > As the delta T was at best 10 deg C, a bias of 6 or 7 deg C would say > there was no excess during the power applied phase. > > Then the heaters were "disconnected" and the RFG was engaged. > > Here I see 2 avenues to apply power during the self sustain mode. > > Via the RFG leads which could be a high DC voltage with a small AC ripple. > This would show up on a AC amp meter as a small current with the DC > supplying the secret heating. > > This job could be split between the Small Blue Box (SBB) AC heater > excitation. It could also generate a DC output with a small AC ripple. > > It amazes me with all the brains in that room and with the future of LENR > credibility on the line, NO ONE brought a portable digital oscilloscope and > looked at what the RFG and the SBB were ACTUALLY generating. Digital meters > are well known to under report current and voltage from complex non > sinusoidal wave shapes. > > But instead of doing proper checking on what was ACTUALLY being fed into > the Ecat, they relied on Rossi. > > Well they got taken for a ride. > > Shaun > >
