Steven,
what's the difference between those 'viruses' and the MEMES postulated by
Richard Dawkins- see "Memetics>"?
Peter

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Orion,
> Hopefully my comment is not understood as trolling....
> but as polite criticism.
>
> It is nice to have imagination and to think about things that are
> considered by main stream science as impossible. I wish more professional
> scientists could do that (some do and they wait until they come close to
> retirement or at least get tenure).
>
> What is also nice, though, is to try to see what could go wrong in a
> particular imagined idea or scheme as a way of understanding better and
> making more concrete what one imagines.
>
> It happened many times to me to think about ideas that I believed were
> great to find out almost always that two things were true:
>
> 1) the idea had some fundamental problem with it and I could not see it
> (at least at first)
>
> 2) the idea was actually good but somebody already thought about it
>
> It is simply difficult to come up with something completely amazing, right
> and original at the same time.
> But one can learn a lot from this thinking and it is a good way to learn
> and think about science and nature that are amazing anyway.
>
> Well, about the buoyancy perpetual motion we have the case that it is
> something unfortunately neither original (in the sense that somebody
> already thought about it) or really working (even if due to relatively
> subtle reasons).
> Somewhere non conservative forces are going to make your device stop. This
> why there is not a working model of such devices but often simulations can
> be found on the net.
>
> Here one example of a pretty complete discussion about different kinds of
> buoyancy perpetual machines and why they don't work:
>
> http://www.hp-gramatke.net/pmm_physics/english/page0550.htm
>
>
> Giovanni
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Speaking of Regularly Scheduled Programming, here's one from Ski-Fi
>> channel!****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> To my surprise, the troll, Eff Wivakeef, before he was banned, posted
>> something that I personally found fascinating and transformational. Well…
>> let me try to explain what I mean by "transformational".****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> <* * * Warning! * * *>****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> This has to do with another one of those strange synchronistic woo-woo
>> events that occasionally pass through my life. If you don't believe in
>> synchronicity or the existence of strange Unidentified Flying Woo-Woos
>> (UFW2s) you might as well skip the rest of this post. ;-)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> </* * * Warning! * * *>****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I'm referring to the Troll's attempt to both taunt and ridicule the Vort
>> Collective by posting a You-Tube link to a bogus free energy device
>> allegedly based on the manipulation of gravity, gradient water pressure,
>> and buoyancy.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> See:****
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-89SiqG3pI0****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> We see an individual, James Kwok, owner of a company called Hidro,
>> explaining how his technology works with the aid of a fish tank filled with
>> water and a flexible tube attached at both ends with inflatable bags. One
>> bag has a weight attached to it. Kwok proceeds to give a warm & fuzzy spiel
>> with birds chirping away in the background on how gravity affects water
>> pressure, and how this pressure buildup in-turn affects the buoyancy of the
>> two inflatable bags depending on how deep these bags are positioned within
>> a reservoir of water.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Ok, so far, so good. I have a pretty decent understanding of the
>> underlying physics involved pertaining to water pressure and the effects
>> buoyancy. Kwok then proceeds to show how he found a way, through some
>> clever engineering tricks, of manipulating the effects of buoyancy by
>> filling ballast tanks with gas. This causes the ballast tanks to become
>> lighter than the surrounding water where they will subsequently rise to the
>> surface. Meanwhile other ballast tanks currently on the surface of the
>> water will fill with water causing them to become heavier than the
>> surrounding water and sink. The end-game to Kwok's fascinating demo is
>> revealed in a simple animated computer graphic where he claims an endless
>> free energy cycle can be harnessed by connecting these ballast tanks with
>> the aid of what looks like a very long bicycle chain. The rotating chain,
>> in turn powers an electric generator. Wallah! Free energy! Brought to you
>> by gravity, water pressure, ballast tanks, and a bicycle chain! What could
>> go wrong!****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> What astonished me was not whether Kwok's contraption would work. (Not
>> very likely!) The mystery I was confronting was what kind of mechanisms
>> might have been involved in bringing Kwok's wacky concept to my attention
>> in the first place. How did this Troll's random post, a troll who didn't
>> know me, a troll who was attempting to taunt members of the list group I
>> participate in, end up posting something that intimately synchronized with
>> something I had been privately mulling about in my head for the past week.
>> During occasional idle moments, I had found myself trying to visualize how
>> one might be able to set up some kind of a "free energy" cycle that could
>> take advantage of gravity/pressure/buoyancy effects. Hey! I know it's a
>> crazy idea! I can't help myself! Long ago I came out of the closet (at
>> least to myself) and accepted the fact that I enjoy playing around with
>> these wacky mental exercises. So far, I haven't gone blind from excessive
>> Imagerybation. My Fool's Imagination seems harmless.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> What this visual exercise brought home to me was a realization that what
>> I thought I had I created out of my own mind probably didn't originate from
>> me after all. It certainly wasn't a personal creation that had originated
>> from the troll's mind as he went about attempting to torment us. Nor was it
>> any more a form of inspiration created from the mind of James Kwok when
>> years ago he stumbled across the same imaginary "figment" and subsequently
>> started diddling with it using his own engineering predilections. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Before someone tactfully asks me whether I might have left my tinfoil hat
>> at home I must state for the record that long ago I came around to a
>> suspicion (a belief) that most of us are constantly being barraged by these
>> kinds of external imaginative energy patterns. It's happening to us
>> regardless of whether we are aware of how such influences might affect our
>> thinking predilections. It is as if these energy patterns are the
>> equivalent of psychic viruses that are constantly flowing through the
>> either of what Carl Jung called the Collective Unconscious. Under the
>> circumstances, I don't think tinfoil would have helped. ;-)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> But take heart. Long ago I suspect our species found practical ways in
>> which to protect ourselves from an incessant onslaught of psychic viral
>> attacks, "viruses" that might actually be a form of "Instinct" as exhibited
>> by animals. Most of us automatically dismiss most of these "viruses" as
>> nothing more than a random thought. This is probably a good thing because I
>> would imagine that our wetware would get pretty cluttered if we didn't have
>> some kind of an automated filtering system set in place. We have
>> constructed our very own firewall. How we have configured our personal
>> filters determines what our wetware will allow through into conscious
>> awareness. A few, like Kwok get hooked on the "viral" imagery because of
>> the way he had configured his personal firewall, but also because he was
>> attracted to similar concepts in the first place! Guess I could say
>> something similar must have happened to me as well... and apparently to the
>> Troll too, in his own mean spirited way.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Once we "capture" one of these viruses, once we become consciously aware,
>> and then intrigued by the imagery associated with them, we begin adding our
>> own unique energy signature to the overall patterns. Eventually, however,
>> we begin tire of the imaginary. We let go of it, and when we do we cease
>> feeding our own unique signature of energy into that portion of the
>> Collective Unconscious. We give it back to the Great Gestalt. Eventually,
>> others will stumble across the same gestalt. They too, will end up adding
>> their own unique signature to the Great Collective. I suspect these energy
>> gestalts residing in Collective Unconscious are like constantly evolving
>> creatures.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I believe science has recently hypothesized the possibility that certain
>> viruses (of the biological kind) might not necessarily be detrimental. Some
>> may actually turn out to be beneficial. There certainly has been talk about
>> engineering artificial viruses that would perform specific biological tasks
>> such as an aid to seeking out and destroying cancer. "Viruses" from the
>> Collective Unconscious strike me as behaving in a similar manner. They are
>> nothing more than psychic tools. Some tools are bound to be better
>> configured than others.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Some may be intrigued by the idea of a Collective Unconscious behaving
>> like a vast repository where inspiration occasionally springs into our
>> conscious awareness. I'm obviously not the first person to have speculated
>> on such ideas. No doubt, there are many who have chosen to run about as
>> naked as they can get... without any protective tinfoil shielding the
>> private parts of their wetware.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Others, on the other hand, may find the idea of a Collective Unconscious,
>> meddling about with their personal imagination, disquieting. It messes
>> around too much with a sacred sense of our identity - our soul, if you
>> will. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In the end, it doesn't really matter whether one believes in all this
>> psychic woo-woo stuff, or not. What matters is whether we are willing to
>> allow ourselves to occasionally become passive, to float along the gentle
>> currents of the present moment for just a tiny spell. Give ourselves an
>> opportunity to RECEIVE ideas in whatever form or shape they decide to
>> reveal themselves to us as. Of course, what we end up DOING with what pops
>> into our head remains a personal predilection of our own doing.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Happy garbage collection!****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> …and now, back to regularly scheduled programming! ;-)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Steven Vincent Johnson****
>>
>> www.OrionWorks.com****
>>
>> www.zazzle.com/orionworks ****
>>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to