________________________________
Von: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
An: Vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Gesendet: 20:52 Mittwoch, 1.Februar 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Sinter or Not to Sinter
...Before long, I have no
doubts I will need a glove box, and industrial microwave, some custom RF
equipment and...
Jojo,
I myself am involved in the design of RF-generators for plasma-generation, and
naturally was curiuous, what to see about that in the real setups, both
theoretically and experimentally. (Rossi/Defkalion)
This is a very sensible matter, I can assure you, but I cannot see any hint,
that RF-generation of any sophistication is involved.
Maybe as a dirt-effect, so to say, but it does not seem to be essential in
initiationg or controlling the process.
Apart from Terahertz differential Laser excitations, which by nature are
difficult, I cannot see anything akin to RF-induced excitation.
Either the process is quite simple, -without any RF- or it is very elaborate.
Just my five cents.
----- Original Message -----
>From: Guenter Wildgruber
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:31 AM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:To Sinter or Not to Sinter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> Von: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
>An: Vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>Gesendet: 19:17 Mittwoch, 1.Februar 2012
>Betreff: [Vo]:To Sinter or Not to Sinter
>
>
>
>With all the floating theories on how Rossi Cold Fusion works, do we have a
>consensus ..
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>
>Jojo,
>
>Just an educated guess from someone peripherally related to the field.
>
>Which means, that, because there is no agreed theory, You have to rely to a
>lot of trial and error and educated guesses.
>
>If You do'nt have a good basic environment >>100k$, and have no colleagues
>for brainstorming, You do not stand a chance of doing something substantial.
>
>I actually am in an environment to hypothetically do this, but I don’t.
>It starts with the funding. We have other things to do, albeit we would have
>lets say 80% of the infrastructure and knowledge to do something like that.
>
>What is missing, is an educated guess --a basic workable theory- which gives
>preliminary results in the first place.
>
>This is a very strange field indeed. Krivit summed it up quite convincingly,
>to my opinion.
>
>http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml
>
>If you place your bet on Ni-H, feel free to do that.
>Any other reactions do not have any societal/commercial value anyhow.
>
>Then you have to place Your bets on LENR, against 'cold fusion', in Krivits
>sense.
>
>Next You have to cultivate Your intuition:
>How should the reactive nickel-surface look like?
>100nm? 5um? This seems to be the range.
>Look at what is possible.
>
>One has to have an extremely good intuition, how to choose the right
>parameters in say 10 dimensions.
>Does Rossi have it?
>Defkalion?
>
>We do not know.
>
>
>
>
>
>
