Man began using fire/combustion approx. 46,000 years ago and we are still using combustion as our primary energy source. I think you should be patient and wait a few more weeks...
The frustration from Rossi is "Nothing from Nothing leaves Nothing" Let's continue to hope we get something. I have hopes that DGT will present independent results over the next few weeks/months. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jarold McWilliams <[email protected]>wrote: > I have been very patient with all of this. I was willing to wait until > March 31, and even then I wouldn't consider it 100% fraud with no tests. > Rossi is a liar if he doesn't even look into conducting a test with Smith, > and there is no reason to believe anything he says with no proof. > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Robert Leguillon wrote: > > From Jarold: > /snip/ > "and what does that say about Defkalion who is only in the LENR business > because of Rossi. If no valid tests are performed by either group by March > 31, this whole thing is most likely a fraud." > /snip/ > > "Defkalion GT was not invited and did not participate officially in any > public demonstration nor the preparation of any other third party's public > event related to LENR devises [sic], since 17th of January 2011." ( > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=258&p=3300#p3300 > ) > When Rossi allegedly failed to meet contractual requirements, Defkalion > went silent. As the relationship was severed, between July to October of > 2011, they weren't releasing any information. These are the expected > actions of someone reassessing their lot. > The impression that I get (baseless speculation) is that Rossi *may* have > misled Defkalion as to his success with Ni-H, and his alleged catalyst. > But, possibly, his core idea of using micro/nano nickel was indeed a > breakthrough. When Defkalion pushed forward on their own, they may have > found a way to get reliable, controllable, excess heat. > Their silence-then-reemergence is interesting. Where Rossi's past may be > entirely consistent with that of someone profiting from outrageous claims, > the named Defkalion directors do not strike me as a group of > con-artists. If the scenario really were that they were "victims of a > con", what are the odds that they could all be brought on board to > perpetuate the scam? These are former chairmen, presidents, and even an > ambassador. > > Aside from a few photos/videos, there has been no evidence that Defkalion > does, or does not have the technology. Inviting people inside, and > promising upcoming independent testing, are great signs that they believe > they do. It is wrong to place arbitrary time frames on what appears to > be a more reasoned approach. They are not obligated to provide us with > anything, but they seem to understand that there is a wall of doubt to > overcome. Moreover, they finally seem ready to address those doubts. > They've even claimed that most of third party tests will be streamed on the > Internet, if the testers agree ( > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=926&start=200 > ). > > Patience. > > R.L. > > >
