________________________________
Von: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 18:21 Samstag, 3.März 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Radiate or Not to Radiate
...their LENR process is a complex one comprised
of many related and interconnected but separable sub-processes which when
combined together ...
Your conclusion is similar to mine.
It is the
intuition of the experimentalist, who
brings those sub-processes together, so that new things happen.
In contrast
to that, established physics follows a different path: spotting ONE missing link
in the theory, and singlemindedly throw billions onto the problem.
The
Higgs-Boson being a prominent example.
Orthodoxy
likes ONE problem at a time, and not a can of worms.
Do'nt know
if this a side-effect of Occam.
Current Nuclear
Physics seems to be in need to evaluate their axioms.
Eg, as I
stressed earlier, the axiom of the 'identity' of all atoms of the same type,
which to me clearly stands in contradiction to the phenomenon of radioactive
decay, where not all atoms are created equal, so to say.
Which is my
irrefutable private pet-theory.
It is
basically the mathematicians, who insist eg in 'identity', but are rarely in
contact with matter.
On the other hand, if the axiom(s) never existed in the first place, physics
and a lot of other sciences would not have started in the first place.
So there is a riddle here.
OK?
>...A
example of such a system that produces radiation and transmutation is the
NanoSpire system. This system is not quantum mechanically coherent and as a
result it will generated intense radiation from its intense fusion process. ...
The
nanospire findings -if true- are even more disturbing than the other -friendly,
nonradiating - LENR effects.
