Thx Bastiaan, I take a look at that tomorrow. My preliminary take a gainst spark-induced reactions is poor COP, because sparks take a very narrow through the reactant, like a lightning through the atmosphere.
Other extreme: Northern lights, which produce low-energy plasma in a big atmospheric volume. This is anecdotal, I agree. Maybe we should make up a thread like 'open source LENR', and collect relevant information there. As a sidenote: My job is generating socalled cold plasmas in a volume of ca 1dm3 via RF at low pressure. Quite different, but there is some similarity in thinking. As an electronics engineer I have no job to loose, when pursuing such an exotic matter. This is quite different from my Phd physics-colleagues, who would risk their career when doing so. I do not even give them a link to vortex, because doing so would put them near a -ahem- nutcase, who even considers that as a possibility. Such is physics today. To my experience Indian, Chinese, Russian, Japanese scientists are much more open to that than the holy grail of sclerotic science in the West. Wo'nt talk about that anymore, and hope it goes under in everpresent chatter-noise. best regards, Guenter. ________________________________ ------------------------------------------ Von: Bastiaan Bergman <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Gesendet: 21:54 Montag, 12.März 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark And a copy of the paper can be found here : http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric-pressure.pdf On Mar 12, 2012 5:11 AM, "Andre Blum" <[email protected]> wrote: >www.fusioncatalyst.org > >Andre > >On 03/11/2012 09:20 AM, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: >hello guys, >> >> >>
