Thanks Bastiaan, very informative and timely link. This was just what I was looking for.
0.3 J per spark, means that at 300 hz, I am providing 90W of equivalent resistive heating to the reactor. I believe this should be enough to heat the reator to the necessary temperature to initiate the LENR effect. Guenter, the idea of an open source LENR project is worthwhile. I have shared my design and will continue to share it in the hopes that it will spur greater cooperation. My designs alway use "off the shelf" parts and pipe fittings you can get from McMaster, Lowe's or Ebay, so they are low cost. My entire setup including the vaccuum pump, the Data logging and all (except supplies) is under $350. My reactor design is disposable, and cost at the most $50 if using the best stainless steel fittings. I do not believe there will be any economies of scale to be had with my design cause they already use the cheapest parts. I think keeping it simple and low cost is one of the keys to successfully replicating Rossi. I wish Bill will consider converting this list into a forum format so that we can share attachments and other files. From: Bastiaan Bergman To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:54 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark And a copy of the paper can be found here : http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric-pressure.pdf On Mar 12, 2012 5:11 AM, "Andre Blum" <[email protected]> wrote: www.fusioncatalyst.org Andre On 03/11/2012 09:20 AM, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: hello guys, just an idea: Working together on an open source-LENR-device. There seems to be quite some knowledge here at vortex, and a couple of people seem to work in their backyard on their own devices. This is suboptimal. How about that: introduce some economy of scale: lets say ten devices, which need not be identical, but have a common base, e.g. nano-Nickel, a certain type of reaction chamber, hydrogen etc. the basic construction could be implemented via division of labour. one builds the basic reaction-chamber, the other procures the nano-Nickel, the third provides for some basic electronics, and so on. It does not make sense to procure nano-Nickel in every individual case. I'm thinking of about maybe ten devices, which share a common design, and can be freeley varied to optimize the effect. The overall concept seems to be straightforward enough, to make this a reasonable approach. It would have the consequence, that nobody can monopolize the technology via patents or secret sausages etc. Waiting for Godot in the form of Rossi or Defkalion otr Miles or McKubre is starting to go onto my nerves. What do You think? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Von: Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Gesendet: 11:14 Sonntag, 11.März 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark Awesome, Great minds think alike, eh? :-) Let us know how it goes. How are you driving your spark plug? I am planning a simple CDI Electronic Ignition Box for a CRRC-Pro 26cc engine: http://www.ebay.com/itm/130659127048
