Hi Bastiaan and others,

I'm currently a in a bit of a hurry in my job, so just a couple of lines of 
thinking:

1) I read this study A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric- 
... which I found quite interesting.
a) the setup allows good calorimetric measurements
b) its is simple

c) It produces about 3e19 H-atoms per second, which seems to be a good number 
and could be up to a distance of ca 40mm before recombining
d) actually, due to the generating process, these must be mostly Ions 
(protons), because the pink light is is indicative of a plasma.
e) at first I was sceptical wrt spark generation, but this one here serves a 
different purpose, more like ignition in a combustion motor, so it is easily 
controlled.

2) idea of a setup (proof of concept-type):
a) use the basic setup for H-/proton generation
b) use a planar layer of Nano-Nickel on the surface of the copper-block, which 
is used for calorimetry
c) direct the Protons to the Nickel-layer via a moderate electrostatic field, 
say 100V/cm, which is easy.
d) measure the amount of excess heat, if there is any
e) use a heating coil to heat up the reactive side, where the Nickel is located 
to some 200-400deg Celsius. 


3) Nickel-powder selection
a) there  are basically lots of suppliers, mostly Chinese
b) particle-sizes offered are mostly in the sub-100nm region, which some here 
consider too small. I do 'nt know.
c) a cheap way to get some compromise-size is this:
http://www.ebay.de/itm/Nano-Nickel-Powder-1217g-N1-200-200nm-Ni-NanoNickel-/310248791616?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item483c44de40
200nm Nickel seems reasonable to me for a first try. look at it and tell 'us' 
what You think.

4) Nickel-powder treatment.
a) My first intuition is, that the powder has to be deoxydized, by whatever 
method: hydrogen atmosphere at elevated temperatures. I currently do'nt know. 
Maybe its irrelevant, because the reactive chamber is reductive.

5) Spark-generation
a) this should be easy (at least for me) Think TV-tubes which used to produce 
20kV DC.

6) Yes, we should find a repository for non-text-documents.

7) This proposed first setup is intended as a intergroup (dis)proof of concept, 
and not a real working horse, warming one's home or such.
Even if Rossi or Defkalion have working devices, which I have some doubts, the 
process to my opinion is not understood.
My personal aim is, to intergrate available knowledge, and give the 
establishment-academics some boost, to move their butts and do their duty.


This for the first round.

best regards
Guenter



________________________________
 Von: Bastiaan Bergman <bastiaan.berg...@gmail.com>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Gesendet: 18:53 Dienstag, 13.März 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark
 
I'm interested, where do you share your design? link?

> Guenter, the idea of an open source LENR project is worthwhile.  I have
> shared my design and will continue to share it in the hopes that it will

> Thanks Bastiaan, very informative and timely link.  This was just what I was
> looking for.
>
> 0.3 J per spark, means that at 300 hz, I am providing 90W of equivalent
> resistive heating to the reactor.  I believe this should be enough to heat
> the reator to the necessary temperature to initiate the LENR effect.
>
> Guenter, the idea of an open source LENR project is worthwhile.  I have
> shared my design and will continue to share it in the hopes that it will
> spur greater cooperation.  My designs alway use "off the shelf" parts and
> pipe fittings you can get from McMaster, Lowe's or Ebay, so they are low
> cost.  My entire setup including the vaccuum pump, the Data logging and all
> (except supplies) is under $350.  My reactor design is disposable, and cost
> at the most $50 if using the best stainless steel fittings.  I do not
> believe there will be any economies of scale to be had with my design cause
> they already use the cheapest parts.
>
> I think keeping it simple and low cost is one of the keys to successfully
> replicating Rossi.
>
> I wish Bill will consider converting this list into a forum format so that
> we can share attachments and other files.

>
> http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric-pressure.pdf
>

Reply via email to