Good questions Bob, I have asked Axil similar but now another thought occurs to me regarding the spatial measurements of Rydberg atoms... how and with what metrics were these measurements determined. I still prefer the inverse Rydberg state for the hydrino inside cavities but am less opposed to a Rydberg state on the surface areas than previously. The paper by Naudts that allows for the existence of the hydrino as relativistic hydrogen led me to a relativistic interpretation for Casimir effect - I failed to give Axil the same consideration regarding Rydberg atoms in this environment which is to say that just as the hydrino can be relativistic so too can the Rydberg atoms...meaning that only their equivalent mass gets larger but they appear to shrink for the same reason a spaceship approaching C appears to shrink from our perspective. It doesn't matter if the acceleration is positive or negative relative to the observer the remote object always shrinks and if the acceleration is "equivalent" the need for spatial displacement inside the bulk material is mitigated. All this to say that Rydberg atoms could be temporally displaced in equal measure like the hydrino [inverse Rydberg] and would make more sense than Casimir effect just enabling one species in favor of another, more likely a segregation occurs due to the geometry where the isotropy normally not broken above the plank level can now be bundled into larger opposing regions big enough for atoms and molecules of gas to exploit. Instead of stretching across the lattice like you suggest they would be time dilated from our perspective while neither species ever occurs from their own local perspective and they simply see themselves as hydrogen. Fran
From: Bob Higgins [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rydberg matter and the leptonic monopol Nice posts on the Rydberg effects, Axil. I like reading them. Please continue posting them. But, I am confused. Could you can help me understand these questions: Rydberg hydrogen has a very loosely bound electron. How would these Rydberg electrons survive high temperature phonon collisions without the atom becoming ionized and as a result breaking up the condensate? With such large orbitals as Rydberg electrons occupy, how can such a phenomenon be considered inside a nickel lattice? The electron orbitals would extend greater than the nickel lattice spacing. Other condensates are possible, but why would you think these are Rydberg? While we know that the LENR appears to happen at the surface, and it also appears to require support from within the lattice (loading) - so it sounds like some kind of condensate effect is needed within the lattice. In the NanoSpire case, it is not clear how the H-O-H-O- crystals that form are Rydberg. What evidence supports this? They may be some kind of condensate, but not necessarily Rydberg. The large dipole moments you describe would certainly make it easy for the Rydberg atoms to couple to other atoms electronically and form a condensate from that coupling. However, I don't see how that strong dipole provides support for the charge evidence that you described from NanoSpire. Can you explain that a little more? On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Rydberg matter and the leptonic monopol This post is third in the series on Rydberg matter which includes as follows: Cold Fusion Magic Dust Rydberg matter and cavitation
