About strength of lobbies things might not be like most people imagine. it is true that oil company are strong lobbies. they kille nuke in US afeter three miles island. but oil is a local product for US, so a kind of protectionism.
in france some imagine that nuke is a lobby. not in fact, execpt through a very french culture from "grandes ecoles", (big engineer school that feed the top manager for state companies). nuclear energy is adapted to our vision of dreamed society (centralized, rigorous, controlled, high tech). but nuclear company are small animal compared to many other lobbies. but in fact today all the industry is a dwarf compared to the communication weaponry of big environmentalis NGO, that have billions budget, and even have the support of most individual journalist... similar to the religious lobbies in non secular countries. so the enemy of LENR, when they will believe in it (sure they ignore it today, other wise they will panic and it will be visible, enev if they panic at 0.1% probability of event) are : 1- the environmentalist NGO 2- oils companies (but they have time to adapt, since oil will be one of the few energy to survive a fiew decades) coal will have to adapt, 1- move furnace to LENR 2- move to Coal to Fuel with LENR energy renewable energy will die since they depend on subsidies that will die quickly, because ne reason to use them now. same for geothermal, hot fusion research. nuke will have to change their businessmodel to work as 1- dismantling existing power plant 2- incinerating nuclear waste, with fast neutron fission or with LENR 3- build big LENR plant. oil will adapt 1- stop non conventional expensive fuel prospection 2- reduce price of producers (saudi&al) 3- move to gaz to fuel from LENR, try coal to fuel 4- down size and restart non conventional fuel prospection, at high price, for the few that need oil (plastic), if any 2012/3/30 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Jarold McWilliams <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you saying that oil companies would rather try to hide cold fusion >> than adapt to it? >> > > Yes, I am certain they would. They are trying to hide global warming with > the help of the Republican party, with considerable success. > > > >> Did they pay off MIT and other mainstream scientists to cover up cold >> fusion? >> > > Not as far as I know. The MIT people are in the plasma fusion program. > They attacked cold fusion to preserve their own funding. That's what they > said, and I believe them. > > I doubt U.S. the oil companies have played any role in the opposition to > cold fusion. As far as I know, no one in any major oil company believes > that cold fusion might be real, so they have no incentive to oppose it. > > in Japan, the fossil fuel energy cartels and the nuclear power industry > did get together to prevent funding for cold fusion, a few years ago. > (Before the Fukishima disaster.) The Minister of Energy told some cold > fusion researchers I know that the government will not support this > research because it would disrupt the energy market. > > I have no doubt that when the oil companies, coal companies, wind turbine > manufacturers and other conventional energy companies realize that cold > fusion is real, they will pull out the stops and do everything they can to > prevent it from being developed. They will spend millions on Washington > lobbyists trying to crush the research. Some human behavior is mysterious. > Other behavior can be predicted with confidence. This behavior is as > certain as the fact that if you open a window in a tall building and drop a > few thousand dollars in loose bills onto Wall Street, people passing by > will take the money. > > The coal industry is presently at war with wind power, trying to make it > illegal in the U.S., because it has taken 4% of their business, and it > threatens to take half. Wind power and big coal would gladly strangle one > another by any means. Their favorite method is to have Congress do it by > passing laws. They will not hesitate to cooperate with one another to > strangle cold fusion. This is business. It is about money. Money is more > important to most people than the survival of the planet, or the survival > of their own children and grandchildren. > > Fortunately, cold fusion will be worth trillions of dollars to powerful > industrial corporations and investors. So even though Exxon and others will > do all they can to prevent it, others will probably see to it that the > research is funded, and that the government allows the technology to be > deployed in the U.S. The US military is in favor of cold fusion and it has > a great deal of political and economic power. Most cold fusion research in > the US for the last 20 years has been funded by the military. During this > time, plasma fusion researchers and some mainstream physicists have > repeatedly taken steps to prevent this funding and fire the military > decision-makers who allowed the research. Sometimes they have succeeded. > They have done this in various incidents several times a year. They are > still at it. I gather they are getting somewhat frantic -- pulling wires > and cashing in chits to stop the research and destroy the reputations of > anyone associated with it. That is how these people operate. That is why > they have so much power and money in the first place. Not because they are > nice people. > > Fortunately, military officers put national security ahead of academic > politics and greed. > > The major establishment opponents probably do not believe cold fusion is > real. But even if they thought it was, I doubt this would affect their > behavior. I suppose they resemble the 1970s tobacco executives, who all > knew that cigarettes kill hundreds of thousands of people. They did not > give a damn how many people they killed. They lied brazenly to Congress and > to the public, saying they did not think cigarettes are dangerous. When you > offer a high salary and no legal restraints, you can always find hoards of > intelligent, skilled, educated people eager to commit mass murder or > destroy the planet. Executives will set up concentration camps or torture > people as long as there is a large profit and no police to stop them. We > know they will, *because they did*, in WWII Germany and the Iraq war. > > - Jed > >
