Dear Peter, I have no idea if the problem is control. Probably yes. Anyway I find really suspect that number 6 is such a magic number: the only invariant in e-cat. While IMHO experiments show that COP is much higher for long time intervals depending on setup. It is like saying that since a one year baby can barely stand up, he will never be able to run a marathon when adult.
Smokemirror for competitors? Avoding troubles for passing certifications? mic 2012/5/3 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear Michele, >> >> A very interesting approach. >> The problem is to NOT confound AR's weaknesses with the >> essence of his E-cat generator that has IMHO (and really, it seems) >> increased with two orders of magnitude the energy >> density and intensity compared with the nanometric Ni etc materials a la >> Arata etc. >> What do you think? >> Peter >> >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Michele Comitini >> <michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> That blog is indeed cursed by a semi-sentient program that believes >>> that its name is AR. >>> >>> While AR can be frustrating at times, when I want answers that make >>> more sense and have deeper implication I use to talk the Emacs doctor >>> (Eliza with a degree in psychotherapy): >>> >>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Total-Frustration.html >>> >>> As you can see from this example, more common sense is in the >>> simulated dialogs: >>> >>> https://scalesoflibra.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/more-fun-with-eliza-the-emacs-psychotherapist/ >>> >>> mic >>> >>> 2012/5/2 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: >>> > Perfect;y possible, however immediacy is in the question >>> > but not in the answer. With Rossi you never know. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Akira Shirakawa >>> > <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On 2012-05-02 21:11, Peter Gluck wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> A recent dialog of Andrea Rossi with one of his kibitzes >>> >>> (only the relevant part): >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you plan to increase the COP in the near future? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> c) I think the keyword here is __near__ future. >>> >> My take: planned obsolescence. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> S.A. >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Dr. Peter Gluck >>> > Cluj, Romania >>> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
