I am just writing kind of explanation-in-context for Rossi's discovery. The news about Rossi's competition are largely exagerated.There is only Defkalion, many classes superior tto Rossi in engineering, management, science (yes because Rossi has only used scientists but is not working with them!), management and business strategy. Little chances that anything else understood what Rossi' so called catalyst is and is not.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michele Comitini < michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Peter, > > I have no idea if the problem is control. Probably yes. > Anyway I find really suspect that number 6 is such a magic number: the > only invariant in e-cat. > While IMHO experiments show that COP is much higher for long time > intervals depending on setup. > It is like saying that since a one year baby can barely stand up, he > will never be able to run a marathon when adult. > > Smokemirror for competitors? Avoding troubles for passing certifications? > > mic > > > 2012/5/3 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Michele, > >> > >> A very interesting approach. > >> The problem is to NOT confound AR's weaknesses with the > >> essence of his E-cat generator that has IMHO (and really, it seems) > >> increased with two orders of magnitude the energy > >> density and intensity compared with the nanometric Ni etc materials a la > >> Arata etc. > >> What do you think? > >> Peter > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Michele Comitini > >> <michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> That blog is indeed cursed by a semi-sentient program that believes > >>> that its name is AR. > >>> > >>> While AR can be frustrating at times, when I want answers that make > >>> more sense and have deeper implication I use to talk the Emacs doctor > >>> (Eliza with a degree in psychotherapy): > >>> > >>> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Total-Frustration.html > >>> > >>> As you can see from this example, more common sense is in the > >>> simulated dialogs: > >>> > >>> > https://scalesoflibra.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/more-fun-with-eliza-the-emacs-psychotherapist/ > >>> > >>> mic > >>> > >>> 2012/5/2 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: > >>> > Perfect;y possible, however immediacy is in the question > >>> > but not in the answer. With Rossi you never know. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Akira Shirakawa > >>> > <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On 2012-05-02 21:11, Peter Gluck wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> A recent dialog of Andrea Rossi with one of his kibitzes > >>> >>> (only the relevant part): > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Do you plan to increase the COP in the near future? > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> c) I think the keyword here is __near__ future. > >>> >> My take: planned obsolescence. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Cheers, > >>> >> S.A. > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Dr. Peter Gluck > >>> > Cluj, Romania > >>> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Peter Gluck > >> Cluj, Romania > >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > Cluj, Romania > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
