Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

They are not better and not suited for the same job as hubble. The quality
> of the instruments is way inferior . . .


How do you know? Where did you read this? Please cite your sources.


The WaPost article is here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/nasa-gets-military-spy-telescopes-for-astronomy/2012/06/04/gJQAsT6UDV_story.html

- Jed

Reply via email to