http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/06/nasa-gets-two-unneeded-hubble-sized-spy-telescopes/


2012/6/4 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>

> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> They are not better and not suited for the same job as hubble. The quality
>> of the instruments is way inferior . . .
>
>
> How do you know? Where did you read this? Please cite your sources.
>
>
> The WaPost article is here:
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/nasa-gets-military-spy-telescopes-for-astronomy/2012/06/04/gJQAsT6UDV_story.html
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]

Reply via email to