Not as long as you keep your pants on. At least I don't think so, but who knows these days?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 9:09 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Pentagon gives NASA two space telescopes it does not need On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, Hubble is a deep space telescope. No comparison. NASA says they can use 'em for a wide angle application. I'm sure. But "wide" is a relative term. "According to the Space Telescope Science Institute, the Hubble Ultra eep Field has an angular size of 11.5 square arcminutes. That means hat it would take 12,913,983 Deep Field images to cover the entire phere of the sky!" http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=720 If it could focus on the Earth, it could count your pubic hairs. ;-) T
