Axil,
You said [snip] the reaction is way deep in the crevice of the
crack. However if SWNT are the NAE, the fusion will be out in the open where
the walls will not shield or thermalize the radiation.
[/snip] The deeper into the crack you go the more suppression increases at the
inverse of distance^4 , Suppression does much more than shield and thermalize -
it changes the rate of spontaneous emissions, radioactive decay and is
responsible for the odd spectrum shifts reported in the Mills plasma. IMHO the
isotropy that is normally only broken at the quantum foam level is segregated
and accumulated into the macro scale regions we refer to as Casimir which can
be exploited by a 3rd body such as hydrogen gas being selectively more exposed
to one type of segregated region as opposed to the other type of region.
Regions with different suppression levels experience different time dilations
exactly the same as spaceships traveling at different high fractions of C
without the need for spatial displacement - the spatial displacement of a
spaceship approaching C is normally in a Pythagorean relationship with C
itself but this is a function of the ether - a constant isotropic value from
OUR perspective BUT if you could change C you would have a really cheap way to
manage to time dilation without the need for displacement..... and this is what
is occurring inside a lattice and moreso in a Casimir cavity -not that you are
getting something for nothing..it's only segregation and is harnessing matter
and geometry to accomplish this nano scale corralling of different space times
- We still have to select a 3rd body with the appropriate dimensions to
selectively favor one type of corral over the other in order to harvest this
differential - I am also of the opinion that covalent bonds formed at one
suppression level are less stable and may disassociate and reform when changing
suppression levels which is responsible for the claims of Lyne and Moller and
may explain why some reported decay anomalies delay radioactive decay while
others accelerate it.
Fran
From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:28 AM
To: Vortex
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Radiation Screening and Charge Accumulation
Axil,
In you proposed theory of Charge Accumulation on 1 dimensional SWNTs, you
propose screening of Coulomb barrier that will result in fusion of H+ with H+
or Ni with H+.
In both of these cases, I believe gammas will be produced in abundance. Ed
Storms' cracks will shield gammas because the reaction is way deep in the
crevice of the crack. However if SWNT are the NAE, the fusion will be out in
the open where the walls will not shield or thermalize the radiation.
In you proposed theory, how is radiation being shielded or should we expect
copious amounts of hard gammas with SWNT NAE?
Jojo
