NO, I am not forcing down my beliefs, I am correcting a grave misinformation.  

If I was mentioning "Intelligent Design" and implying that those who do not 
believe in Intelligent Design were all somehow biased and stupid, everybody in 
this forum would be all over my case.  But that my friend is what Jed is doing 
with his incessant talk of Global Warming, Darwinian Evolution and all other 
leftist socialist ideas.  Take his opening post on this thread.  He implied 
that those of us who do not believe in AGW are somehow biased and do not accept 
the "facts".  That's the load of bullcrap that I find offensive in many of 
Jed's posts (as well as yours.)  

My friend, this is a science forum.  I come here to get away from all the 
religious, political, and social controversies.  I find it disconcerting that 
many here have taken up this forum for their own personal agenda.  Especially 
when the rules categorically says otherwise.

We always know that certain topics are controversial and you would be all over 
me criticizing me if I so much as mention Intelligent Design.  NO!!! That won't 
happen - you say.  Well, it already happened.  A simple comparison between the 
treatment of cold fusion and the treatment of Intelligent Design elicited such 
strong emotions from this group from no less than our "esteemed" doctor Peter 
Gluck.  And I have been the reciepient of such foul language that you wouldn't 
want your children to hear.

Yes, you despise what I believe; but don't worry, I feel the same way about 
yours.  But why do you feel it is your right to spew such stupidities in this 
forum?  I asked you to stop posting those topics because they are in clear 
violation of the rules and the response I get is "Rules are guidelines" and "We 
will do what we want."  If anarchy and "strongman dictatorship" is what you 
want in this forum; that is exactly what you will get.  But I value this forum 
that I do not want that to happen.  Hence, my constant appeal to moderation.


Jojo


PS.  By "Strongman Dictatorship"; I mean the attitude of some who have been 
here long to feel that they can dictate the rules of this forum.  The prevalent 
belief that since they were here first, they can do anything even up to and 
including violation of the rules.  In elementary school, we have a name for 
those children - we call them Bullies.  And when a group of old timers do that 
to those they don't agree with; that's called a gang of bullies.  It's nice to 
know certain members of vortex have not graduated from these childish 
tendencies.






  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 8:00 PM
  Subject: RE: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides


  From Jojo,

   

  > Indeed it is getting silly.... Silly how people jam their beliefs

  > of AGW down your throat.  There is NO AGW.  But even if there was,

  > as many people said here, I'd rather have it warmer than colder. 

  > Colder weather is more an environmental catastrophe than weather

  > that is warmer a few degrees.

   

  And You're not expressing your personal beliefs down the Collective's throat 
either?

   

  You strike me as feeling quite threatened by all this AGW talk. It really 
bothers you doesn't it. Tell me Jojo, in your worst nightmare scenario, where 
AGW could possibly "win" not the scientific battle, but the political battle 
and the majority begins to "believe" in AGW ramifications, and lawmakers start 
to implement some of the suggestions AGW scientists have recommended we do. How 
would the ramifications of such a policy change affect you personally?

   

  > Once again, this is not about environmentalism per se. 

  > This is an occultic pantheistic movement, nothing more

  > than the worship of Mother Earth.

   

  Again, I appreciate the fact you've come out of the closet in a really big 
and flaming way within the Collective in regards to your personal beliefs on 
AGW and whatnot. But does the premise of AGW really threaten your beliefs on 
such matters that much? It's not like anyone here is forcing you to marry a 
particular belief possessing a gender you disapprove of. Certainly, a few in 
the Collective disagree with you... your belief on the AWG matter, but that's 
not the same thing as putting a shotgun to your head and saying it's my way or 
the hi-way.

   

  Regards,

  Steven Vincent Johnson

  www.OrionWorks.com

  www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to