Dear Daniel, you well know that they are using some additives to enhance the process; Rossi has named these the Catalyst. The opinions inside the company nd for their friends are divided some say they are telling too much ( I am on this side too). Please focus on what is most valuable in what they say is that in order to get enrgy you maust work ahrd both on hydrogen and on Ni, otherwise itt does not work. They have found a way but I believe there are other ways too- all bassed on radica changes of the nature of H and Ni
And do not wait simple theories tio be good, in your own intellectual interest Best wishes to you Daniel Peter Peter On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Those slides and also their paper presented on ICCF 17, which is also > available, are sadly inconclusive. They just add confusion to the mass. > > I asked someone to ask defkalion people if they had done isotope analysis > and to ask what were the light elements. > > They said they did no isotope analysis, yet they said there was no > transmutation of Ni. I don't know how could they conclude that. > > Also, they did not find Triton, He3 or He4 among the light elements. They > found lithium, beryllium and boron, though. > > So, they claim things completely different from any group before them. > They are sloppy and illogical . I am completely confused. Maybe they do not > have good intentions, after all? > > Considering only the paper presented in the conference, it is not clear to > me if they used isotopic ratio mass spectroscopy, which means, it seems did > not try to determine the isotopes, they just plotted the variation of the > mass of the samples with great accuracy. It's not possible to figure out if > the samples were contaminated. > > It seems they used this: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductively_coupled_plasma_mass_spectrometry > > When they should have also used: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope-ratio_mass_spectrometry > > Their data on small mass elements is still crazy, just with the crude > method. This is unlike anything that was seen before, as far as I know. > > 2012/8/14 Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > >> Dear Friends, >> >> I have just published a paper inspired by Defkalion's recent publications. >> It is about LENR definition and theory and its *SPECIAL TARGET IS THE >> PARTICIPNTS* >> *OF THE THEORY PANEL AT ICCF 17.* >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/defkalion-big-bad-problem-is-definition.html >> >> Best wishes to you all, >> >> Peter >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
