They are proposed to range from the largest of 6.6 billion solar masses down to 23 micrograms, the planck mass, about a grain of sand, but collapsed. I propose that they are not really "stable" they are always emitting some form of Ultra Low Momentum Radiation (see I can event my own terms also!) Whenever they come close enough to external matter or are fed energy of any kind they instaneously convert that matter to energy and evaporate it back to their environment, going back to a stable thermodynamic state.
Large black holes belch higher levels of radiation when they consume a star or other matter that comes close enough all I am saying is that their babies do the same. http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.3208 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole On Friday, August 17, 2012, wrote: > In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:53:15 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Feed yor gremlin a steady diet of hydrogen without any powder and you will > >not get neutrons. This thing is ripping atoms apart > [snip] > > How big/heavy does a gremlin have be in order to remain stable, i.e. for > the > mass consumption rate to equal the evaporation rate? > > (I realize that the mass consumption rate is variable, but please provide > some > reasonable limits.) > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
