CE, I think you need to gather your thoughts in one place, write a comprehensive paper and flesh out many lacking details to your theory, instead of repeating yourself ad nauseam here in Vortex, and interject your theory at every post.
Your theory as posted in your blog is glaringly incomplete. I read your theory and I found it a bit lacking. I would like to see some mathematical support to your suppositions. Mathematical computations as to energy levels required, creation rates and evaporation rates. If you can come up with these, it would go a long ways in providing guidance for experimentation, which I would be willing to do if it is within my capability. Also an explanation with mathematical data as to why a singularity is formed in a void or crack as you propose instead of fusion occuring. Saying that "quantum gravity is large, hence it creates a singularity" ain't gonna cut it. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, of course, and assuming that you are serious about developing your theory and not just playing with your colleages here in Vortex, seeing how many your can loop around for a spin. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: ChemE Stewart To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 8:09 PM Subject: [Vo]:Miley, et al - 62M Neutrons within 5 minutes - dangerous? They are proposed to range from the largest of 6.6 billion solar masses down to 23 micrograms, the planck mass, about a grain of sand, but collapsed. I propose that they are not really "stable" they are always emitting some form of Ultra Low Momentum Radiation (see I can event my own terms also!) Whenever they come close enough to external matter or are fed energy of any kind they instaneously convert that matter to energy and evaporate it back to their environment, going back to a stable thermodynamic state. Large black holes belch higher levels of radiation when they consume a star or other matter that comes close enough all I am saying is that their babies do the same. http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.3208 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole On Friday, August 17, 2012, wrote: In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:53:15 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Feed yor gremlin a steady diet of hydrogen without any powder and you will >not get neutrons. This thing is ripping atoms apart [snip] How big/heavy does a gremlin have be in order to remain stable, i.e. for the mass consumption rate to equal the evaporation rate? (I realize that the mass consumption rate is variable, but please provide some reasonable limits.) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
