Jojo, I get 3.77 square meters of area with a quick calculation. This is the entire surface area of the cylinder. Please check your figures and let me know if there is an error.
This is very interesting information from Rossi as, if true, his device now would fit nicely within a locomotive size tractor. It is time to do some further research into this. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Aug 29, 2012 6:31 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi said... This is incredible power density. Seems unbelievable how you can pack 1MW output from these dimensions. If true, this is more revolutionary than we thought. I did some rough calculations. With diameter of the cylinder at 1.2 m, the area is 1.13 m2. Assuming that the coolant pipes take up about 50% if this area, and fitting remaining area with 100 reactors. Each reactor would have a diameter of 4.2 cm. Each 4.2 cm dia. reactor would be producing 10KW. Dave, maybe you can do some simulations on if it even is possible to remove this much heat from such a reactor. Another thing. Rossi says he's shocked. Does this mean that Rossi no longer does the main development. Otherwise, How can he be shocked by something he is developing himself? Or maybe, he is shocked by the extent of his own imagination. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Ellul To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 5:45 AM Subject: [Vo]:Rossi said... Andrea Rossi August 29th, 2012 at 3:05 AM Dear Dr Joseph Fine: You are perfectly right: in fact we are designing the new 1 MW plants, for hot temperature, and the dimensions will be those of a cylinder with a diameter of 1.2 m and a lencth od 0.4 m. Is shocking, I myself are surprised, but it is so. Warmest Regards, A.R. Andrea Rossi August 29th, 2012 at 9:45 AM Dear Franco: Attention: the dimensions 1.2 x 0.4 is not the surface of the surface of the reactors! Inside this drum of 1.2 x 0.4 m there are 100 reactors , each of one having about 1 200 cm^2 of surface ! I talked of the dimensions of the external container, not of the heat exchange surface ! Warm Regards, A.R. Regards, Patrick
