Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find out
if it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
Wolf
Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote . . . or translated, I
guess, the small print:
"This certificate relates solely to the above identified prototype
machine within the limits of the request for voluntary testing of
essential health and safety requirements relevant to Annex I of
Directive 2006/42/EC. The certificate does not constitute a
"product certification" and cannot, in any way, be used for
commercial purposes and / or advertising by the company on whose
behalf the certificate was issued.
Ah ha! So I guess that means: this is a certificate to operate a
prototype experimental device as such, in an experimental mode.
Right?
It is an official document certifying the reactor.
Well, that is certification, sort of. In a way. A classic Rossi-ism.
Similar to the claim that Ampenergo made an investment. Okay it was
not a gigantic company as he claimed. And they did not actually have
any money, as far as I know. So it was an investment in a narrow
sense. V-e-e-r-r-y narrow. Not as in: someone wrote a check for real
money. You might call it a virtual investment.
This is hysterical.
The reality distortion force field is with you, Obi Wan Kenobi Rossi.
I say never bet against Rossi, and never invest with him.
- Jed
