Mark Gibbs asks rather impatiently, "Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at the very least as proof of CF/LENR?"
Very simply and obvious reasons. lack of details of exactly how, and patent infringement! The testing at SRI is getting underway and hopefully will go a long way to achieving what you ask. -Mark Iverson From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Gibbs Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Godes/McKubre 100% reproducability If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the poster child for CF/LENR?! And why hasn't the CF/LENR research community exhaustively investigated the system and built working models that would show, irrefutably, that CF/LENR is real? In following this list I've read about scores of theoretical systems and theories that it seems no one has actually made work reliably and here you're claiming the Godes/McKubre system not only works but works reliably! Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at the very least as proof of CF/LENR? [mg] On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: Is this the first paper in which one group has reported100% success in multiple tests (over 150)? Yup, it may be. I do not recall seeing such a high success rate before. There may have been a few poorly documented reports of 100% success that I suspected were 100% instrument artifacts. I seem to recall some, but I do not remember who made these claims. They did not publish a paper. I do not remember uploading anything like that. I think I would remember it. Normally I would be very suspicious of an effect that appears every time, on demand. But when it comes from a a top-notch lab such as SRI I am not going to worry about it. - Jed
