As Jed says, there are not enough resources directed toward the field. I am currently reviewing Celani's device since he has published a reasonable document and data. I hope to mine that for as much knowledge as possible before moving on. Perhaps information will become available concerning the Godes/McKubre system to attract my attention. If enough data is released, you can be assured I will take a look.
My effort is directed toward doing whatever I can to get LENR systems into service as soon as possible. Thus far this effort is at my expense and I offer my knowledge openly. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 5:07 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Godes/McKubre 100% reproducability Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the poster child for CF/LENR?! Because it just happened. They only began this work 6 months or a year ago as I recall, and this is the first paper. The official collaboration with SRI just began. Things happen slowly in experimental science. The shortest significant unit of time is a growing season. (Paraphrasing "The Soul of a New Machine.") Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at the very least as proof of CF/LENR? It is being refined. They just got a pot of investment money to do that. It is not being "promoted" because SRI does not promote things. - Jed
