hello Jojo,

This Guardian article answers on behalf of me to you. You will probably
just ignore this article, because it does not fit on your ideology, but
still I would appreciate if you would take a look at it. Things are not
always as rosy as they are meant to be. It is extremely rare that the
richest are hard working entrepreneurs who are creating valuable
innovations out of their irreplaceable mind.

*Mitt Romney and the myth of self-created millionaires*
*The parasitical ultra-rich often deny the role of others in the
acquisition of their wealth – and even seek to punish them for it*
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/24/mitt-romney-self-creation-myth

No, almost all the very richests are financial speculators who are
utilizing loopholes in legislation often by avoiding
regulations recycling dirty money through offshore islands. Therefore they
are more like criminals, because their contribution does not add value to
the society, but is almost always destructive. E.g. Gina gathered huge
profit from Australian housing bubble and the ones who paid her profit were
common hard working Australian house owners, whom you classified as
gluttonous, rebellious and lazy people.

I am personally huge fan on Elon Musk, who is the living proof that single
person can make the difference. However Elon is extremely rare example of
the classical hero of capitalism. There are just not too many of those on
the Forbes billionaire list who are also the chief designers of the best
rocket ever built, i.e. Falcon 9, that is to be launched for the first
commercial operation at this Sunday.

I apologize about the political nature of this message, but I would guess
that due to elections they should be tolerated if they are not leading into
flooding the mailing list.

—jouni


On 3 October 2012 05:42, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> **
> This idea that poverty is the root cause of criminality is at best naive
> and at worst moronic.  This can only come from the liberal minds of
> socialistic/communistic people who think that "Income Redistribution" is
> the panacea for all societal ills.  My friend, stealing from people who
> work hard for their income and redistribute it to lazy bums will not cure
> sociatal ills.  You are smarter than to believe in that solution.
>
> Let's take a real life example.  The United States has more felons and
> criminals on a per capita basis than any other country in the world,
> including such 4th world countries like the Philippines who are poverty
> stricken to the core.  The United States is flushed in food and resources
> and conveniences, and yet manage to produce more criminals and felons than
> any other country.  Please, I would like to hear your explanation why the
> US has more criminals than the Philippines (on a per capita basis).
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
> PS. The root cause of crime is not poverty. but rather the inherent sin
> and rebellion in the hearts of a glutonous, rebellious and lazy society.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com>
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:50 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Designer of 3-D Printable Gun Has His 3-D Printer
> Seized
>
>
> I would think that only way to combat this problem is to eliminate poverty
> from the society. About 95% of the criminality is due to unjust
> distribution of wealth. This is not that individual humans would resort
> into criminality if they fail to find job due to high unemployment rates,
> but because children are crown in the conditions where no children should
> be allowed to live.
>
> Best way to eliminate poverty is to set zero income level for each
> individuals into 1000-2000 dollars per month. This can be done quite easily
> by distributing income more justly. When there is no scarcity of the basic
> needs, there won't be breeding grounds for violent gangs and violent larger
> scale religions, because every child will get a proper and free education.
>
>

Reply via email to