To which I responded: Not that I can speak for Robert Park, but it is not that he is bragging that he knows nothing, but rather that he knows who to listen to. Indeed, this is virtually the entire history of the “cold fusion” fiasco including the early 1990 rejection by the US editorial staff of “Nature” of Oriani’s replication of the phenomenon despite the peers selected by “Nature” having reviewed and approved the paper. One can only speculate as to whom they were listening and why.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: > At 03:53 PM 10/30/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Wow! Mary Y relays your post !! http://blogs.**scientificamerican.com/** > cocktail-party-physics/2012/**10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-** > case-against-cold-fusion/#**comment-473<http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2012/10/29/genie-in-a-bottle-the-case-against-cold-fusion/#comment-473> > > Jed Rothwell writes on another forum that he thinks he's being censored so > I will take the liberty to post this for him. It's not my view. > .... > >
