I would like to see the money spent on emf protection for the population.
If the sun has a bad spell we may need to climb inside our Faraday cage
microwave ovens for protection.

Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com

On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Jones Beene wrote:

> Well... Not sure how much faith to put into this kind of story, but the sad
> part is that the military could do this kind of R&D - whereas the energy
> sector could not even think about it due to cost and interference from
> special interests - so there are scary implications that demonstrate the
> kind of mess this country in.
>
> Curious that they surmise that the missile payload is a "super-powerful
> microwave" oven. Geeze, why not use that kind of power supply for LENR, or
> hot fusion, or subcritical fission - instead of mischief (knocking out a
> bunch of antique computers)?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Blanton
>
> No longer bogosity:
>
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2241525/The-Boeing-blitzing-d
> rone-cripple-nations-electronics.html
>
> "Down the years and across the universe, the heroes of science-fiction
> classics from Dan Dare to Star Wars and The Matrix have fought
> intergalactic battles with weapons that wipe out enemy electronics at
> the touch of a button.
>
> Now scientists have turned fantasy into reality by developing a
> missile that targets buildings with microwaves that disable computers
> but don't harm people.
>
> Aircraft manufacturer Boeing successfully tested the weapon on a
> one-hour flight during which  it knocked out the computers of an
> entire military compound in the Utah desert."
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jones Beene 
> <[email protected]<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Interesting - yes. Bogosity index - extreme.
> >
> >
> >
> > A tomahawk cruise missile leaves no massive contrail. Most experts agreed
> > the amount of visible vapor was either coming from a solid fuel rocket or
> a
> > large jet. The contrail from a cruise missile would be two orders of
> > magnitude less visible, based on the fuel burned and it would be lower on
> > the horizon.
> >
> >
> >
> > A blogger did find a commercial flight that could have been responsible,
> but
> > why this info did not immediately come from the FAA is a mystery. Another
> > blogger suggested it was Meg Whitman's reaction to the final bill from
> her
> > campaign ..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Terry Blanton
> >
> >
> >
> > This is a far more interesting explanation:
> >
> >
> >
> > Chinese EMP Attack Prompts US Missile Strike After Cruise Ship Crippled
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1421.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > T
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to