Your suggestion to put on the aluminum hats begs a few questions. What is the instantaneous output power of the emitter? How many joules of energy would be deposited into that hat of yours due to this device? Is the damage to the electronics permanent or does it just cause a reset? If the damage is permanent, why?
I could think of many more questions, but I have a feeling that there are going to be few answers submitted. Dave -----Original Message----- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 12:24 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:oops Time to get the tin-foil hats out of storage... ;-) -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:oops Well... Not sure how much faith to put into this kind of story, but the sad part is that the military could do this kind of R&D - whereas the energy sector could not even think about it due to cost and interference from special interests - so there are scary implications that demonstrate the kind of mess this country in. Curious that they surmise that the missile payload is a "super-powerful microwave" oven. Geeze, why not use that kind of power supply for LENR, or hot fusion, or subcritical fission - instead of mischief (knocking out a bunch of antique computers)? -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton No longer bogosity: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2241525/The-Boeing-blitzing-d rone-cripple-nations-electronics.html "Down the years and across the universe, the heroes of science-fiction classics from Dan Dare to Star Wars and The Matrix have fought intergalactic battles with weapons that wipe out enemy electronics at the touch of a button. Now scientists have turned fantasy into reality by developing a missile that targets buildings with microwaves that disable computers but don't harm people. Aircraft manufacturer Boeing successfully tested the weapon on a one-hour flight during which it knocked out the computers of an entire military compound in the Utah desert." On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting - yes. Bogosity index - extreme. > > > > A tomahawk cruise missile leaves no massive contrail. Most experts > agreed the amount of visible vapor was either coming from a solid fuel > rocket or a > large jet. The contrail from a cruise missile would be two orders of > magnitude less visible, based on the fuel burned and it would be lower > on the horizon. > > > > A blogger did find a commercial flight that could have been > responsible, but > why this info did not immediately come from the FAA is a mystery. > Another blogger suggested it was Meg Whitman's reaction to the final > bill from her campaign .. > > > > > > From: Terry Blanton > > > > This is a far more interesting explanation: > > > > Chinese EMP Attack Prompts US Missile Strike After Cruise Ship > Crippled > > > > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1421.htm > > > > > > T
