Time to get the tin-foil hats out of storage... ;-) -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:oops
Well... Not sure how much faith to put into this kind of story, but the sad part is that the military could do this kind of R&D - whereas the energy sector could not even think about it due to cost and interference from special interests - so there are scary implications that demonstrate the kind of mess this country in. Curious that they surmise that the missile payload is a "super-powerful microwave" oven. Geeze, why not use that kind of power supply for LENR, or hot fusion, or subcritical fission - instead of mischief (knocking out a bunch of antique computers)? -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton No longer bogosity: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2241525/The-Boeing-blitzing-d rone-cripple-nations-electronics.html "Down the years and across the universe, the heroes of science-fiction classics from Dan Dare to Star Wars and The Matrix have fought intergalactic battles with weapons that wipe out enemy electronics at the touch of a button. Now scientists have turned fantasy into reality by developing a missile that targets buildings with microwaves that disable computers but don't harm people. Aircraft manufacturer Boeing successfully tested the weapon on a one-hour flight during which it knocked out the computers of an entire military compound in the Utah desert." On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting - yes. Bogosity index - extreme. > > > > A tomahawk cruise missile leaves no massive contrail. Most experts > agreed the amount of visible vapor was either coming from a solid fuel > rocket or a > large jet. The contrail from a cruise missile would be two orders of > magnitude less visible, based on the fuel burned and it would be lower > on the horizon. > > > > A blogger did find a commercial flight that could have been > responsible, but > why this info did not immediately come from the FAA is a mystery. > Another blogger suggested it was Meg Whitman's reaction to the final > bill from her campaign .. > > > > > > From: Terry Blanton > > > > This is a far more interesting explanation: > > > > Chinese EMP Attack Prompts US Missile Strike After Cruise Ship > Crippled > > > > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1421.htm > > > > > > T
