Craig <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are you seeing the fluctuations that are here?
>
> http://i50.tinypic.com/2e49mbd.jpg
>
> I can't pull up that exact graph, but the fluctuations are similar in
> the lower P_Xs Low parameter.
>

Ah, that does look better. The periodicity is maybe a little too regular.
But better.

As noted, calling up two days of data may have smoothed things too much.


Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

You may personally not want to make this important distinction, but "cold
> fusion" obviously refers to fusion, most notably with deuterium - and this
> is only a fraction of what can be covered by LENR. The term "cold fusion"
> should be dropped for all references to NiH - unless and until there is
> arguable evidence of fusion. There is none.
>

I don't care how many angels can dance on that particular pin-head.

I do not know anyone who has even looked for evidence, so I don't think
that is significant.

For now I will stick with McKubre's principle of the conservation of
miracles.

- Jed

Reply via email to