Harry, You said it best yourself. It "may still" .....
Why not settle the science before forcing draconian measures? To fix a
"may" and a "possibility" is both expensive and irreponsible.
What is so unreasonble with that stand? as if I am some rabid anti-AGW and
oil producer puppet as some have implied. In fact, I can assure you, I am
doing more to lower my carbon footprint than almost all here, including that
most rabid AGW propagandists in this forum. And I am doing it voluntarily.
I am set to spend over $50,000 for some biogas, wind and solar systems to
wean myself from my carbon footprint. I dare you to find anyone of the AGW
propagandists in this forum willing to make that level of commitment. Like
I said, going green is sensible if you give people a choice; not force it
down their throats.
So, enough of this AGW propaganda. If you devote as much effort in weaning
yourself from raghead oil than the amount of effort you put into promoting
it, you would have gone a long ways.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Veeder" <hveeder...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Data "Worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global
Warming ....
I guess a true global temperature would
be an average over all altitudes... which may still be rising?
Harry
