That a statement is endlessly repeated does not make it true. I posted at length on the family practices of the Arabian peninsula, as they pertained to Christian, Jewish, and pantheistic communities, and to the pre-revelatory emergence of Islam, which limited some of the practices that many people today criticize.
But Jojo seems not to have seen this posting, though he did say he would respond to it (and this I hope from his own knowledge rather than assertian-based pseudo-sources), for he repeats assertions that are shown in the posting to be flat-out incorrect. On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > <[email protected]> wrote: >> At 10:37 PM 12/30/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote: > >>> Hence, in you, the corruption of islam is seen by everyone. The same >>> corruption that justifies to the world that it is OK to fondle a 9 year old >>> little girl BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS, just because other people are doing it. >>> No matter how you justify it, that's CREEPY. >> >> >> BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. What is >> obviously false does not become more true by being repeated over and over. >> Jojo actually acknowledged that this one was false, but has continued to >> emphasize it. > > > Jojo is using hyperbole so calling it false is an ineffective repsonse. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole > > Harry >
