If they actually returned to perform more tests then it most likely is a good sign. Had the ECAT been a total failure, it is unlikely that they would bother to recheck it.
I have my fingers crossed. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Jan 18, 2013 5:01 pm Subject: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News January 17th, 2013 at 10:36 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=776&cpage=2#comment-565344> Dear tomconover: I did not read the report, yet, because it has not been published yet. By the way, the Third Party members returned this week to make more tests to clear some points that they had to repeat, while I am in Miami. I know that there are skeptics too. I fear we will have to wait for the publication to know about the report. Maybe I will have its final version the day before the publication, maybe not. About the plantas, they are in construction. Warm Regards, A.R. Bad news : yet another jam-tomorrow deferment Good news: Could be to clarify a point raised during peer-review (lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat -- and the defkalion hyperion -- Hi, google!)
