It is a ball of entropy known as a micro black hole. They make up 95% of the universe. I think you should stick to music with a name like that
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Giovanni Santostasi <[email protected]>wrote: > Chem, > I think you should stick to chemistry. I don't want to be impolite but > which nonsense is this? > What is an entropic particle? LOL > Common. > Giovanni > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote: > >> According to my Research & Theory: >> >> 1) The Earth has an entropic dark matter core and creates its own iron >> and nickel. Geologists are way over their head trying to explain it away >> as a bar magnet. >> 2) The Earth's entropic core creates its own magnetic fields thru >> annihilation and charged orbital dark matter and other particles >> 3) The Earth's entropic core battery gets recharged as the sun spits >> entropic particles at us triggering our weather and seismic events out here >> on the crust. Many of the large particles coalesce with the Earth's >> entropic core and also cool the Earth down >> 4) We are just part of the colorful 5% crust. >> 5) If you look at that Chandra X-Ray Matrix, the Earth is one of the >> intersecting/nodal points connected to the Sun which is a larger nodal >> point. >> 6) The sun is about to get a millennial supply of orbital dark matter >> from those two great comets coming . I just pray no nuclei break off and >> come our way. Should be a good show either way. >> >> Stewart >> darkmattersalot.com >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> There are many problems with this theory. >>> One even if all these ideas would hold they could be applied only to >>> later stages of the universe life because iron and nickel are created by >>> massive stars and then released into space when they died as supernovae. >>> >>> Also consider that iron and heavy materials are very rare exactly >>> because only very massive stars can produce these materials. >>> Furthermore what you call natural magnetism is not something that occurs >>> so naturally for dust in space. >>> On earth natural magnetized material become magnetized because of the >>> Earth magnetic field. Look up how magnetic rocks get magnetized in wiki: >>> >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_magnetism#Thermoremanent_magnetization_.28TRM.29 >>> >>> You need a huge dynamo magnet like the one at the core of the earth to >>> magnetize small things like rocks. >>> >>> The dynamo magnet is created by plasma that rotates at the center of the >>> Earth and creates by induction a magnetic field. The fact that there is >>> iron at the core helps to make the magnetic field stronger and helps to >>> carry the electrical current of the plasma but it is not the source per se >>> of the magnetic field of the earth. The sun doesn't have iron at the core >>> and it has a very strong magnetic field. >>> >>> The iron ended up at the core of the Earth because it is heavier >>> than silica and the other lighter elements that make the earth crust. >>> >>> Gravity is the dominant force at astronomical scales because it acts on >>> everything not special materials (like in the case for magnetism). Yes, it >>> is weak but when you are dealing with huge quantity of stuff that dominates >>> all the other forces in particular because electrostatic charges tend to >>> neutralize themselves coming in pairs and magnetic forces are produced by >>> moving charges and decay rapidly. >>> >>> And so on... >>> The theory makes not much sense in physical terms. Sorry. >>> Giovanni >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:55 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> The vortex-l group of individuals have a great deal of knowledge and >>>> open minds that I enjoy prodding on occasions. This morning an unusual >>>> concept came into my mind which resulted in a hypothesis that I would like >>>> to put forth. >>>> >>>> Suppose that the universe is organized by the influence of magnetic >>>> attractions between materials such as iron and nickel that can be >>>> permanently magnetized instead of gravity, at least in the formative years. >>>> We all know that gravitation is by far the weakest force within the >>>> universe so why should we assume that such a modest effect would dominate? >>>> My hypothesis is that this concept is entirely backwards and that the >>>> basic structures are formed by magnetic influences. After the magnetic >>>> effects have completed their portion of the task the gravitational >>>> influence completes the puzzle. >>>> >>>> Picture a region in open space that has a large collection of dust >>>> and gases. It is certain that many specs of iron or nickel laden dust >>>> exist within this region and that many of these posses natural magnetic >>>> fields. The attraction due to the magnetic field would dominate the net >>>> attraction between these particles by an extremely large margin. As time >>>> progresses the magnetized portions would strongly attract and then collect >>>> together into larger magnetic units. This should occur far faster than >>>> gravitational collection due to the enormous difference in forces. >>>> >>>> So, masses such as the earth's core come together quickly and consist >>>> of large concentrations of iron and nickel and any other magnetic >>>> materials. The same would occur in the early formations that eventually >>>> become other planets and stars. When the collection of magnetic materials >>>> is mostly completed, then it would be natural for the less magnetic matter >>>> to be gravitationally concentrated toward these large metallic centers. >>>> >>>> In my model, it seems likely that pebbles held together magnetically >>>> should withstand much more pounding in collisions than those merely >>>> confined by gravity. This difference in cohesive strength should further >>>> tend to result in large magnetic bundles at the expense of those formed of >>>> other materials. With this in mind, it seems likely that all the planets >>>> that form in a region of space that contains the metals that can be >>>> magnetized will grow an iron like core first and quickly until these >>>> materials have been swept clean of the region. This process is then >>>> followed by the gravitational attraction of the metal cores to the gasses >>>> and other materials. >>>> >>>> The same type of influence should be exhibited throughout the >>>> universe at large. Some of the formations have appearances that seem >>>> unusual if gravitation is the prime force at work. Gravity does not >>>> generate shapes with spatial directivity to the degree that magnetic >>>> attraction does. Gravity only pulls items towards each other in a straight >>>> line. Magnetic materials generally have a dipole field or a complex field >>>> that is composed of the addition of many such dipoles. >>>> >>>> If we consider that my hypothesis results in the collection of the >>>> magnetic materials rapidly and dominantly throughout space, then each of >>>> these would tend to influence others of their kind in the near vicinity. >>>> This should dominate the early formation of matter that eventually leads >>>> to galaxies, etc. I suppose that it is a good thing that the magnetic >>>> fields of iron masses falls off rapidly with distance due to the dipole >>>> nature or the universe might be dominated by truly enormous collections of >>>> magnetic core objects. The shorter range of these dipoles compared to the >>>> monopole of gravity allow what we observe today. >>>> >>>> Is it possible that the enormous black holes at the centers of >>>> galaxies began in this magnetic manner? It would not be difficult to >>>> imagine that most of the iron and other magnetic materials would be swept >>>> together first and fast if present within a nearly created dust cloud. >>>> Once a core has been established, it should easily dominate the remainder >>>> of the cloud and attract the gasses by its quickly formed gravitational >>>> field that reaches far into space. >>>> >>>> Another idea to consider is that the strong magnetic field at the >>>> core of the black hole reaches out far enough to impart directivity to the >>>> motion of materials moving in the direction towards its center. Any >>>> smaller magnetic masses would be pushed or pulled by the mother field of >>>> the hole into directions that tend to follow its field pattern. The >>>> smaller magnetic components would then impart some of this force upon the >>>> gases and other materials by direct coupling among them. As the total >>>> combination of materials approach the hole, the kinetic energy imparted >>>> upon the mass send it past the north or south polar region into orbit. It >>>> is premature to attempt to define the structure of a black hole under the >>>> influence of magnetic effects until a more complete picture emerges. >>>> >>>> I can visualize the wild and amazing behavior that would be imparted >>>> upon a gas with magnetic particles immersed within as it approaches a large >>>> magnetic black hole. Once the gas is turned into a plasma by the heat and >>>> forces applied, it would possess a tremendous electric current induced >>>> within by the motion through the hole's magnetic field. Great forces could >>>> occur that may result in the beams that are seen emitted by the galactic >>>> center black holes. Perhaps someone could allow a super computer the >>>> chance to predict this behavior. >>>> >>>> The hypothesis is supported by the known core of the earth. this is >>>> known to be composed of iron and nickel. >>>> >>>> Meteorites are composed of various materials. The metallic ones have >>>> a large concentrations of magnetic matter within that may have collected >>>> together rapidly at the formation of the parent body. >>>> >>>> The shape of the clouds associated with the enormous explosions of >>>> super nova tend to be non symmetrical on many occasions with patterns >>>> associated with dipole or quadrapole fields. >>>> >>>> Do other vortex members see support of reasons to believe that this >>>> hypothesis is not workable? I am seeking inputs from our esteemed members >>>> that might help to put this puzzle together. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
