I read the article and it definitely states that the electricity is generated 
by a temperature differential.  If you immerse the cell within a constant 
temperature environment, it appears as if you can not get any electrical 
energy.  This is consistent with what I have seen in the past where two 
temperature sinks are required.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: David Jonsson <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jan 29, 2013 8:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:100% conversion of heat to electricity with 
thermophotovoltaics


So what is wrong with the Wikipedia article?


What I mean is that regardless of how efficient the thermophotovoltaic is there 
is no other way for heat-energy to escape the enclosure except as IR-light 
converted to electricity. With this forced arrangement how can electricity 
generation be anything except 100 %? 


There is no Carnot cycle since energy flows from one end to the other. There is 
no cycle involved. 


David



David Jonsson, Sweden, +46703000370




On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:


David,
 
You are possibly misreadingthis article. It is poorly written to begin with.
 
Carnot efficiency affectsall heat engines in a similar way. 
 
Moreover, it is a basic limitationwhich deducts “off the top” so all other 
inefficiencies deduct from the lowernumber.
 
 

From:David Jonsson 


 


Hi

I have imagined using thermophotovoltaics to produce a highly 
efficientconversion from heat to electricity.

Imagine having a heat source in a very thermally wellinsulated container. In 
the same container there is a thermophotovoltaic cellconverting the heat 
radiation into electricity.

Wouldn't a cell like that be very efficient? Whatstops it from being 100 % 
efficient, or having its efficiency reduced only byleaks in the thermal 
insulation?

Even if the Carnot efficiency 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermophotovoltaic#Efficiency

is low it doesn't affect the total efficiency. Theemitter will always be hotter 
than the converter, since the converter convertssome of the heat radiation. 
There will always be some efficiency. Increase ofdark current, as Wikipedia 
mentions as a reason for efficiency decrease athigher temperature, should be 
the same in both directions in the converter andcould not lower efficiency.

Either efficiency could be higher or the explanationsof the efficiency lowering 
effects are wrong.

 

Best would be to build a device and see what willhappen. 

 

David


 







 

Reply via email to