I think soon you will be able to make a synthesis of this ideas and to publish a condensed paper with clear inner taxonomy. In the introductory part perhaps you could speak about the differences between the interesting and the useful kinds of LENR. It would a lesson of reason and of complexity, please make it elegant and simple.
Peter On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Post 5 > > At the very end of all the resonance amplification chains that we have so > far described lays exposed the smoking gun at the very heart of the LENR > reaction. This LENR end game is just as exponentially fruitful and maybe > even more so as all the many resonances that have set up this final step. > > > It is my long held belief that charge separation is the fundamental cause > of the LENR reaction. All the many resonance mechanisms described so far > are directed solely toward accumulating highly focused charge separation > between the NAE walls and the hydrogen filled dielectric void between them. > > The nano-voids are filled with hydrogen and a large accumulation of > electrons some coherent in a condensate at ground state and some highly > energetic in an artificial atom of a quantum dot topology. > > These nano-voids preform two quantum functions simultaneously; they hold a > mirrored electron condensate at the ground state; where the associated ions > in the walls of these voids form a mirrored condensate. > > Now at the same time, once free high energy electrons are trapped in an > artificial atom within the nano-voids. > > Either has the Bose-Einstein Plexciton Condensation has not ended at the > level of the individual cavity. The thermally stabilizing bath of the > hydrogen envelope will synchronize all the nano-cavities that the hydrogen > touches into a state of group condensation at the ground level. > > All this preliminary pre-configuration of the NAE under the influence of > the aforedescribed resonances sets the stage for the atomic leveled > conditions that make certain the nuclear reactions within the filamentary > nickel walls of the NAE. > > Here is how this improbable and almost universally doubted event goes > down… when two micro-particles grow near and touch, they act as a high > voltage capacitor like circuit where the highly amplified negative charge > on all the micro-particles is concentrated right at the contact points. The > larger that the voltage of the negative charge is, the greater is the EMF > enhancement factor that can be achieved. > > These points of contact are enclosed within a dielectric hydrogen filled > volume of under a nanometer. These particles are all highly negatively > charged in absolute terms, but if there is a relative charge difference > between them as surely there must be, charge separation will occur between > the void and the walls of the void. > > Nanowires on the micro-particles keep the bulk of micro-particles from > actually touching. These wires interconnect and intertwine to form the > voids where electrons and ions will concentrate. > > The dipole charges of all the electrons/ion pairs that are generated by > the incident infrared radiation present in a hot LENR reactor will > concentrate at these contact points between the particles within the > network of entangled and enmeshed nanowires. > > In this nano-dimensioned environment, atomic processes come to dominate. > The far field charge effects on these dipoles are canceled by destructive > Fano resonance and the constructive dipole Fano resonance amplifies the > near field effect. > > This atomic level resonance leads to an additional huge enhancement in > charge separation effects of hundreds of times in the small hydrogen filled > volume that manifests at the contact point between the particles. > > The baseline level of charge separation effects was indeed large to begin > with, but now the capacitive nature of the micro-particles has intensified > it beyond all imagining. All this prodigious charge separation so far > accumulated is focused in a volume with dimensions of less than a nanometer. > > This EMF enhancement has already been amplified by orders of magnitude by > the other resonance mechanisms so far described. More atomic level > exponential topological amplification is now applied. > > In the case of Rossi type micro-particles, there are nanowires projecting > out of the surface of these micron sized particles. When piled together, > the micro- particles touch each other on multiple sides. > > These points of contact form a zone of dipole charge concentration > amplified to a huge extent. This is where the NAE is born. > > This point of dipole charge separation between the nanowires at the > contact points between the micro-particles and is where the nuclear active > sites are created. > > Nuclear transmutation and energy production on the atomic level occurs on > and within the walls of these nanowires. > > > Cheers: Axil > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The large concentrations of energetic electrons in the NAE will drive the >> hydrogen ion and the positive nickel core of the atoms in the walls of the >> NAE together under the influence of the Shukla & Eliasson effect. >> >> >> This condition can be briefly summarized conceptually as a nano-scale >> patch of quantum mechanically entangled strongly-correlated subsystems of >> oppositely charged particles that are mutually coupled to each other via >> the electromagnetic fields of the dipoles and to ‘underlying’ substrate >> subsystem in the walls of the NAE; these charged Cooper pairs like >> collections of electrons and ions form a two item matched subsystem that >> could be viewed as ‘mirror’ quantum condensate. >> >> Caused by the Shukla & Eliasson effect, the resultant attractive force >> between positively-charged ions would help facilitate formation of >> proton/ion Cooper pairing: while it is not terribly difficult to imagine >> creation of Cooper pairs of entangled electrons in an confined electron >> subsystem, the issue of comparable pairing for protons/ions is somewhat >> unfamiliar - more problematic. >> >> But because the Plexcitons are bosons (particles with integer spin) above >> a critical density to temperature ratio may macroscopically populate the >> ground state of a system, in an effect known as Bose-Einstein Condensation >> (BEC). Under the coherent influence of the infrared background supported by >> both the hydrogen envelope and the lattices of the micro-particles, the >> Plexcitons population will settle into a common state which results in >> condensation. >> >> Surface plasmon polaritons in a periodic array of metallic nanorods >> couple strongly to excitons in a steady-temperature hydrogen envelop acting >> as a heat bath, and bosonic quasiparticles known as plexcitons are formed. >> By increasing the plexciton density through optical thermal pumping, the >> thermalisation and ground state accumulation of the plexcitons in the >> angular spectrum and in real-space will result. >> >> Jointly, polarization build-up of the emission takes place. A new state >> of light-matter emerges upon plexciton condensation, and a coherent thermal >> radiation field emanates from this quantum phase transition. Plexciton >> condensates are the warmest and least massive of any condensate yet >> reported which is well beyond the melting point of most metals >> >> The resonant count continues to increase. It now stands at 14 and we are >> not done yet. Added to the resonance list is Plexciton condensation and ion >> cooper pairing in the walls of the NAE. >> >> >> >> Cheers: axil >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Post 3 >>> >>> The design priority for the LENR+ developer of the micro-particle based >>> LENR+ system is to pack as many electrons into the volume of the reactor as >>> is conceivably possible. >>> >>> The best way that this objective can be met is by using the >>> photoelectric production of electrons to its best effect. >>> >>> Photo-electrically active additives can be added to the hydrogen >>> envelope to produce electrons from the radiation that the NAE on the >>> surface of the micro-particles generate. >>> >>> In the photoelectric effect, electrons are emitted from electropositive >>> matter (metals, compounds, non-metallic solids, vapors or gases) as a >>> consequence of their absorption of energy from electromagnetic radiation of >>> very short wavelengths and high frequency, such as ultraviolet, x-ray, and >>> gamma radiation. >>> >>> Electrons emitted in this manner are called photoelectrons. >>> >>> These additives generally have a low work function to favor the >>> production of electrons. >>> >>> The energy of the emitted photoelectrons does not depend on the >>> intensity of the incoming light, but only on the energy or frequency of the >>> individual photons. It is an interaction between the incident photon and >>> the outermost electron of the electron emitting elements. >>> >>> The activity of these electron emitting elements is greatly enhanced if >>> they form multi-atom clusters in which ion explosion can occur. >>> >>> Radio frequency stimulation activates this cluster formation process. >>> Being a coherent source of radiation, the RF cools the photoactive elements >>> into cluster formation. >>> >>> Such clusters provide great high energy stopping power in which inner >>> electrons of the cluster are displaced from the ion core of the cluster and >>> moved to the loosely coupled electron cloud orbiting the outer boundaries >>> of the cluster >>> >>> The more a cluster is ionized, the easier it gets for x-ray photons to >>> further ionize additional electrons in that cluster. >>> >>> Energy levels in bulk materials are significantly different from >>> materials in the nanoscale. Let’s, put it this way: Adding energy to a >>> confined system such as a cluster is like putting a tiger in a cage. A >>> tiger in a big zoo with open fields will act more relaxed, because he has a >>> lot of room to wander around. If you now confine him in smaller and smaller >>> areas, he gets nervous and agitated. It's a lot that way with electrons. If >>> they're free to move all around through a metal, they have low energy. Put >>> them together in a cluster and beam x-rays on them, they get very excited >>> and try to get out of the structure. >>> >>> In getting to the breaking point, when the ionized cluster eventually >>> reaches an ionization limit where the remaining electrons cannot sustain >>> the structural integrity of the cluster any longer, an explosive >>> disintegration of the cluster and subsequent plasma expansion of the >>> positive ions and electrons which once formed the cluster occurs. >>> >>> Multi-electron ionization of molecules and clusters can be realized by >>> photoionization of strong x-ray photons. >>> >>> The multi-electron ionization leads to an explosive disintegration of >>> the cluster together with the production of multi-charged atomic ion >>> fragments. >>> >>> This photoelectric positive feedback process produces large numbers of >>> high energy electrons injected into the hydrogen envelope that surrounds >>> the micro-powder that is producing the x-rays. >>> >>> What causes this accelerating weakening of the structure under the >>> onslaught of x-ray photons radiation is “barrier suppression ionization”. >>> >>> The initial arrival of x-ray photons begin the formation of plasma that >>> is localized within the cluster itself. >>> >>> The electrons initially dislodged by the x-ray photons orbit around the >>> outside of the cluster. These electrons lower the coulomb barrier holding >>> the electrons that remain orbiting the cluster’s inner atoms. These >>> remaining electrons reside in the inner orbits closer in to the nuclei of >>> their atoms. >>> >>> Excess electric negative charge in the gas carrying the clusters will >>> also add to the suppression of the coulomb barrier further supporting >>> cascading cluster ionization. >>> >>> The LENR+ designer must use every trick in the book to pack as many >>> electrons in the hydrogen envelope as he possibly can. >>> >>> When enough electrons are removed, the structure of the cluster cannot >>> sustain itself any longer and the cluster explodes. >>> >>> In order to take advantage of the energy produced by “barrier >>> suppression ionization”, the designers of the LENR+ reaction must satisfy >>> two main engineering goals: first, large photoactive clusters must be >>> formulated, and two, copious amounts of high energy x-ray photons must be >>> produced. >>> >>> The negative charge that this additional ionization supports reduces the >>> tunneling losses suffered by the electrons confined inside the NAE volumes >>> thus allowing this confined negative charge to increase. >>> >>> The more equalized negative charge on either side of the walls of the >>> NAE will tend to keep electrons inside the NAE. >>> >>> In addition as an added bonus, these all pervasive high energy electrons >>> will form a collection of fermion particles that collect into artificial >>> atoms in the NAE volumes with will provide a first line gamma ray frequency >>> down shifting when these electrons also absorb high energy photons from the >>> nearby LENR reactions. >>> >>> I am saying that two kinds of electrons accumulate in the cavities of >>> the NAE: fermions and bosons. These particle types are defined by the >>> origin of where these electrons are created, either from dipoles or from >>> photoelectrons. >>> >>> An added advantage to x-ray to electron photoelectric conversion is the >>> reduction of the high energy radiation loading generated by the reactor. >>> Because we now have all these high energy electrons in the hydrogen >>> envelope and within the NAE, we can now take advantage of the Compton >>> Effect. >>> >>> When a beam of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation passes through a >>> material or a volume containing free electrons, an interaction takes place >>> between the incident photons and the free electrons. In this interaction, >>> inelastic photon-electron scattering, energy and momentum are transferred >>> from the photons in the incident beam to the electrons. X-ray and gamma-ray >>> energies are rather large compared to the binding energies of the electron >>> gas that permeate the volume of the reactor, such that these electrons can >>> be treated as essentially free. As a result of energy transfer to the >>> electrons in the absorbing material (hydrogen), both intensity and energy >>> of the high energy EMF beam from the NAE is reduced. >>> >>> The resonant count continues to increase. It now stands at 12 and we are >>> not done yet. Added to the resonance list is as follows: >>> >>> Photoelectric conversions of x-rays to high electrons. >>> >>> Increase negative charge suppressing electron tunneling of electrons out >>> of the NAE cavities. >>> >>> RF creation of photoactive clusters with high x-ray stopping power, high >>> energy electron production through kinetic energy transfer. >>> >>> Electron energy and quantity gain using “barrier suppression ionization” >>> during cluster based photoelectric ionization. >>> >>> Formation of artificial atoms within the NAE volume which down shifts >>> gamma radiation. >>> >>> >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Post 2 (corrected) >>>> >>>> Micro-particles provide another means for the amplification of the LENR >>>> effect through resonances. >>>> >>>> In a bulk material, there are hot spots and thermally dead areas in the >>>> lattice that result in an uneven distribution of heat and associated phonon >>>> choppiness. Breaking up the lattice into equal size pieces mitigates this >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> In addition, micro-particles provide a regular structure that can ring >>>> like a bell when the proper resonance EMF frequency is applied to them. >>>> >>>> The large number of micro-particles provides a large surface area >>>> multiplication factor which greatly increases the surface area on which the >>>> LENR reaction can take place >>>> >>>> Just like crystal glass broken by an opera singer, the micro-particle >>>> will respond with pronounced resonant gain when it feels the proper EMF >>>> frequency applied to it. >>>> >>>> This EMF is heat or infrared black body radiation. There is a specific >>>> black body infrared frequency that each micro-particle will respond to when >>>> it is exposed to it. >>>> >>>> The response of the particle will be relatively week if the frequency >>>> is above or below the resonant frequency. >>>> >>>> The resonant frequency provides a set point temperature that is >>>> proportional to the size of the micro-particle. >>>> >>>> The applied EMF will give the vibrations inside the particle ever >>>> increasing constructive gain that can achieve a very high phonon intensity >>>> limit. >>>> >>>> The micro-particle system will tend to settle on the resonant >>>> temperature because when the temperature is high the temperature of the >>>> system will drop until the system hits the resonant frequency. >>>> >>>> The system will fail to startup if the resonant temperature is not >>>> reached or exceeded. >>>> >>>> The micro-particle system will be the most productive when a large >>>> fraction of the particles are the same size. I consider this behavior as >>>> another resonant mechanism that amplifies electron photoelectric >>>> production. >>>> >>>> To make the system start up more easily, however, as a compromise to >>>> practicality, some deviation from the particle sizing rule should be >>>> allowed. The larger particles size distribution arrays will gradually >>>> ratchet up the startup temperature in steps proportional to the sizes of >>>> the startup particles until the temperature of the system corresponds to >>>> the set point temperature. >>>> >>>> The set point temperature provides the minimum size that the >>>> micro-particle should be configured to. This disciplined particle sizing >>>> practice will avoid runaway burn up. >>>> >>>> A small sized particle will result in a higher set point temperature. A >>>> large particle will produce a lower temperature. >>>> >>>> Photoelectric resonance. >>>> >>>> When the temperature of the particle is optimum, the phonon vibrations >>>> will couple to the electron gas most strongly. >>>> >>>> The key to LENR is to get that electron gas as dense as possible to >>>> support coulomb screening through charge screening. This is another example >>>> of how resonance supports the LENR+ intensity difference over the random >>>> LENR process. >>>> >>>> Resonance count in the micro-particle based LENR reaction is up to >>>> seven with the addition of micro-particle usage, lattice surface area >>>> increase, equal particle sizing, blackbody temperature resonance, and >>>> optimum photoelectric/EMF coupling. >>>> >>>> I will next cover how a positive feedback loop with the clusters in the >>>> hydrogen envelope will increase the electron gas density. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers: axil >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Post 2 >>>>> >>>>> Micro-particles provide another means for the amplification of the >>>>> LENR effect through resonances. >>>>> >>>>> In a bulk material, there are hot spots and thermally dead areas in >>>>> the lattice that result in an uneven distribution of heat and associated >>>>> phonon choppiness. Breaking up the lattice into equal size pieces >>>>> mitigates >>>>> this issue. >>>>> >>>>> In addition, micro-particles provide a regular structure that can ring >>>>> like a bell when the proper resonance EMF frequency is applied to them. >>>>> >>>>> Just like crystal glass broken by an opera singer, the micro-particle >>>>> will respond with pronounced resonant gain when it feels the proper EMF >>>>> frequency applied to it. >>>>> >>>>> This EMF is heat or infrared black body radiation. There is a specific >>>>> black body infrared frequency that each micro-particle will respond to >>>>> when >>>>> it is exposed to it. >>>>> >>>>> The response of the particle will be relatively week if the frequency >>>>> is above or below the resonant frequency. >>>>> >>>>> The resonant frequency provides a set point temperature that is >>>>> proportional to the size of the micro-particle. >>>>> >>>>> The applied EMF will give the vibrations inside the particle ever >>>>> increasing constructive gain that can achieve a very high phonon intensity >>>>> limit. >>>>> >>>>> The micro-particle system will tend to settle on the resonant >>>>> temperature because when the temperature is high the temperature of the >>>>> system will drop until the system hits the resonant frequency. >>>>> >>>>> The system will fail to startup if the resonant temperature is not >>>>> reached or exceeded. >>>>> >>>>> The micro-particle system will be the most productive when a large >>>>> fraction of the particles are the same size. I consider this behavior as >>>>> another resonant mechanism that amplifies electron photoelectric >>>>> production. >>>>> >>>>> To make the system start up more easily, however, as a compromise to >>>>> practicality, some deviation from the particle sizing rule should be >>>>> allowed. The larger particles size distribution arrays will gradually >>>>> ratchet up the startup temperature in steps proportional to the sizes of >>>>> the startup particles until the temperature of the system corresponds to >>>>> the set point temperature. >>>>> >>>>> The set point temperature provides the minimum size that the >>>>> micro-particle should be configured to. This disciplined particle sizing >>>>> practice will avoid runaway burn up. >>>>> >>>>> A small sized particle will result in a higher set point temperature. >>>>> A large particle will produce a lower temperature. >>>>> >>>>> Photoelectric resonance. >>>>> >>>>> When the temperature of the particle is optimum, the phonon vibrations >>>>> will couple to the electron gas most strongly. >>>>> >>>>> The key to LENR is to get that electron gas as dense as possible to >>>>> support coulomb screening through charge screening. This is another >>>>> example >>>>> of how resonance supports the LENR+ intensity difference over the random >>>>> LENR process. >>>>> >>>>> Resonance count in the micro-particle based LENR reaction is up to six >>>>> with the addition of particle usage, equal particle sizing, blackbody >>>>> temperature resonance, and optimum photoelectric/EMF coupling. >>>>> >>>>> I will next cover how a positive feedback loop with the clusters in >>>>> the hydrogen envelope will increase the electron gas density. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers: axil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Post 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> The key to understanding how to control the Rosssi type Ni/H reaction >>>>>> is to grasp how heat, radiation and electrons affect each other in the >>>>>> lattice and in the surrounding gas envelope and how to control this >>>>>> interaction. There is a half dozen reinforcing processes that increase >>>>>> both >>>>>> heat and electron density on the surface of the lattice. >>>>>> >>>>>> This description of the LENR reaction assumes that the Plexciton is >>>>>> the lattice structure that is the active agent of Micro-particle LENR. >>>>>> >>>>>> Defining terms and laying out the basics of the LENR reaction: >>>>>> >>>>>> Heat interacts with the lattice at the sites of lattice imperfections >>>>>> to activate NAE. This is the exciton: a bound state of an electron and >>>>>> hole >>>>>> which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force. It >>>>>> is >>>>>> an electrically neutral quasiparticle. The lattice must be excited so >>>>>> that >>>>>> these dipoles are formed. Heat, the first important LENR parameter is >>>>>> applied to the lattice to produce excitons. Excitons are bosions with >>>>>> spin >>>>>> one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next, A plasmon is a quantum of plasma oscillation. Plasmons are >>>>>> collective oscillations of the free electron gas density. In explanation, >>>>>> at optical frequencies of heat through the photoelectric effect, heat >>>>>> (infrared light) coupes with free electrons and causes them to oscillate >>>>>> on >>>>>> the surface of the lattice forming plasmons. >>>>>> >>>>>> The photoelectric effect aggregates negatively charged plasma of the >>>>>> free electron gas and a positively charged background of atomic cores. >>>>>> The >>>>>> background is the rather stiff and massive background of atomic nuclei >>>>>> and >>>>>> core electrons which we will consider being infinitely massive and fixed >>>>>> in >>>>>> space. >>>>>> >>>>>> The negatively charged plasma is formed by the valence electrons of >>>>>> nickel hydride that are uniformly distributed over the surface of the >>>>>> lattice. >>>>>> >>>>>> If an oscillating electric field is applied to this solid, the >>>>>> negatively charged plasma tends to move some distance apart from the >>>>>> positively charged background. As a result the lattice surface is >>>>>> negatively polarized and there will be an excess positive charge on a >>>>>> base >>>>>> upon which the see of electrons float. >>>>>> >>>>>> When these waves of electrons (plasmons) interact with excitons, >>>>>> coherently coupled plasmons and excitons give rise to new optical >>>>>> excitations--plexcitons--due to the strong coupling of these two >>>>>> oscillator >>>>>> systems. These quantum coherent Plexcitons fill the Nuclear active >>>>>> environments (NAEs) and form the intense electromagnetic fields greatly >>>>>> amplified through Fano resonance that produce fusion in the NAEs; but >>>>>> more >>>>>> on that latter. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will describe in detail what the NAE looks like in detail, but at >>>>>> this juncture it can be described as a nano-sized volume that store >>>>>> electrons separated from their atoms on the surface walls of the cavity. >>>>>> >>>>>> The walls are positively charged and the dielectric gas that fills >>>>>> the void (hydrogen) is negatively charged with a coherent alternating >>>>>> current of electron gas. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because the Plexcitons are bosons, there is no limit to the number of >>>>>> these quasiparticles (the electron half of the dipole) that can be packed >>>>>> into the NAE. The other positive hole part of the dipole resides on the >>>>>> walls of the NAE. >>>>>> >>>>>> This coherence of the electron gas with the IR EMF is the first level >>>>>> and most basic level of resonance in the Ni/H reaction. >>>>>> >>>>>> One way to increase the strength of the LENR reaction is to increase >>>>>> the density of the electrons gas that floats around on the surface of the >>>>>> lattice. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am interested in the system that uses micro-particles for the >>>>>> lattice because that type of system provides additional resonances to >>>>>> increase reaction intensity. >>>>>> >>>>>> This amplification process through the use of micro-particles is the >>>>>> subject of my next post. >>>>>> >>>>>> Resonance count in the micro-particle based LENR reaction so far is >>>>>> one. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
