* * * I MUST TAKE EXCEPTION HERE: Some of my good friends are Morticians:
>
> "It was concluded that the inhalation [by rats] of (13)C-FA at 10 ppm
> for 6h did not result in an increase of the total FA concentration in
> blood."
>
> This confirms that inhaled formaldehyde does not enter the blood, or
> is all bound to other larger molecules in the blood --
* * * IF THE ABOVE OBSERVATION is meant to stimulate us to
draw inference that chronic respiration of FORMALDEHYDE does NOT
cause DRAIN-BAMBAGE; observation of CHRONIC RESPIRE'S of
Formaldehyde; who have NOT yet EXPIRED would tend to REFUTE
this misguided NO HARM hypothesis. . .
. . . Uuuuuuugh, uuuuuugh, DUH; d'ya THINK?! ! ?
REGARDING THE RATS: They were holding their breath OBVIOUSLY. . .
. . . There are just SOME THINGS that EVEN RATS WON'T DO. . .
IT'S HISTORICALLY TRUE: That DATA(perceived DATA)
can be MISAPPLIED and/or Misinterpreted; especially in regards
to a very NARROW VARIABLE SET. . .
HOWEVER; Large Data-Sets(VERY LARGE) provide clearer
'trend/pattern' recognition as STATISTICAL ANALYSIS tends
to strain out random false(seeming)positives and/or false(seeming)
negatives balancing those against eachother and bringing CLARITY
TO THE BIG PICTURE.
