I disagree. The words “was corroborated by the rear-side hot electron spectra.” would not be used to determine the power of a laser beam.
I believe you misread the sentence. On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:06:00 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >W&L now includes a reference to spasers in the following on page 26: > > > > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=11&cad=rja&ved=0CDEQFjAAOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewenergytimes.com%2Fv2%2Fsr%2FWL%2Fslides%2F20120706LatticeEnergySlides.pdf&ei=JxBaUbmTJarC4AOe1oHoCA&usg=AFQjCNGIA5OCFP0wCWogsAF0RiKYCnMwRA&sig2=EZC1zIg_0FxZ6I_Rwjfo1A > > > > they site this info > > > >"We demonstrate that aligned carbon-nanotube arrays are efficient > >transporters of laser-generated mega-ampere electron currents over > >distances as large as a millimeter. A direct polarimetric measurement of > >the temporal and the spatial evolution of the megagauss magnetic fields > (as > >high as 120 MG) at the target rear at an intensity of (1018–1019) W/cm2 > was > >corroborated by the rear-side hot electron spectra. Simulations show that > >such high magnetic flux densities can only be generated by a very well > >collimated fast electron bunch." > > > >An intensity of (1018–1019) W/cm2 is a very high electric field don't you > >think? > > I think 1E18-19 W/cm^2 was the laser output, and that the target had no > bearing > thereupon. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
