From: Axil Axil The reason this claim of W-L theory is ludicrous --- Of course this is not LENR, but it is the model for gamma downshifting, and if you want to assert two distinct miracles - then it is wise to show some other evidence than the very phenomenon you wish to explain - with your outrageous claim. Gamma suppression does not cause LENR; it is accidental to the LENR reaction. However, it is still very important. It is the principle demarcation line between LENR and LENR+. Nonsense. There is no such thing as "gamma suppression" . It is a complete fabrication of W-L without a shred of evidence AFAIK. if you have the evidence, please show it The LENR reaction emits gammas and this energy release destroys the nuclear active sites. The LENR reactions will soon stop as the NAE are blown apart and cratered. More disinformation. There is no possibility of nano-sized sites stopping gamma radiation. This requires thick lead shielding. On the other hand, LENR+ thermalizes the energy that is produced in the NAE as a secondary mechanism, but this thermalization of the reaction allows the LENR+ reaction to occur over and over again from the same NAE for months on end. There is no evidence for this.
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now! Jones Beene
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... MarkI-ZeroPoint
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Harry Veeder
- RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be... Roarty, Francis X
- Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be... mixent
- Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be... Harry Veeder
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Kevin O'Malley
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Axil Axil
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Axil Axil
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Axil Axil
- RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Axil Axil
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Harry Veeder
- [Vo]:Probability fields ... was: A pile of clues... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... Eric Walker
- Re: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by no... mixent

