http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2645159/posts
TESTING VALIDATES HYDRINO THEORY “Working with a team headed by Dr. Alexander Bykanov at Harvard's Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics under contract with GEN3 Partners, the device showed hydrogen spectral emissions below 80 nanometers, the previously known "ground state" of hydrogen. Scientists formerly believed there could be no parts of the hydrogen atom smaller than the atom itself. "This is decisive evidence of the existence of hydrinos as Dr. Randell Mills theoretically predicted," the BlackLight Power press release said. Hydrinos are a fractional element of hydrogen that skeptics in the world of quantum physics previously said could not exist. “This is smoking-gun evidence of the existence of hydrinos," Dr. Mills said. "The light signature observed is from pure hydrogen and exists at a much higher energy level than deemed possible for this element in any known form.” But suppose there is another way to blue shift the hydrogen spectrum that Mills is not aware of; a plasmonic way. Could his world view be in jeopardy? On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:24 PM, P.J van Noorden <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > Hello Axil, > > Do you really think that QM is the end of the story? > How is it possible that an electron can circle around a positive H atom > and not radiate. > That is only possible when you postulate nonradiation. > This is a very unscientific way of explaining. > > Peter > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 07, 2013 12:14 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:April 2013 Defkalion GT Interview > > The evidence that Miles provides is spectroscopic. The blue shifts that > Mills sites are due to polariton far field frequency emanations from a > micro cavity or grain boundary. Hydrinos violate the rules of quantum > mechanics. > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:47 PM, P.J van Noorden <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ** >> Hello Axil, >> >> I just send an article about the theory of R.Mills to vortex. >> It was an attachment so it is probably rejected. I thought about that >> only after I send it to vortex. >> If you are interested I can send it to you. >> The article is called: The fallacy of Feynman’s and related arguments on >> the stability of the hydrogen atom according to quantum mechanics. >> >> >> Peter van Noorden >> the Netherlands >> > >
