this theorem was formulated when robots where omni-present, actually it is about experimenters who do NOT possess a *guiding Theory* * * Peter
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:13 PM, DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote: > who you calling a monkey :) (smiling) > > Dennis > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:11:22 +0300 > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:If I want to see it for myself... > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > I wonder if a specific variant of the > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem > can be applied to these tests with an infinite number of experimenters > trying an infinite number of cathodes etc ...will be able to find the > best, always succesful experimental set. > A bit more pragmatically, unlimited funding will surely result in > reproducible > powerful Pd/D systems? > Peter > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:48 PM, DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Materials- yes that is an important part of it all.**** > > I started with palladium fountain pen nibs (way back in 89) - Schaeffer > “snorkel” – it is what I could get back then. **** > > You get higher power density with "3 or 4 nines " palladium (but the > really pure stuff 5 nines doesn't work very well ??) but if it is > replication (at lower densities) you seek- try the Pd 23% Ag material used > in diffusion systems. If you have the ability to alloy your own, I would > recommend Pd 10% Y or Pd 2% Ce to start with. The Y alloy has about 3 times > the diffusion rate and is quicker to load.**** > > Be sure to load slow, cool and for a long time (see paper- DO NOT RUSH > LOADING). There is some evidence that loading Pd at around 10C helps (it > matches the vacancy sizes and the wavelength of the D) Then raise the > current density and temp (best run over 65C).**** > > I wish you luck and patience. We need more serious experimenters. **** > > (if you use Pd sheet- look over the 17 step protocol Letts and I > disclosed in 2003 at ICCF10- It is lengthy but it seems to give reasonable > results)**** > > Best wishes, > Dennis > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:28:25 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:If I want to see it for myself... > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote: > > I , of course have a bias, however I would say if you attempt reproducing > the effect you may wish to look over Letts' and my paper: > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CravensDtheenablin.pdf > > > Excellent advice! > > Also: > > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEhowtoprodu.pdf > > However, the key thing is to get good material, and that is not easy. The > ENEA makes it, but they only share it with accredited university and > national labs. > > I suppose you might try some Johnson Matthey hydrogen filter palladium. As > I said, Martin recommended that. It was the old formula. Perhaps it had > trace elements in it that enhanced the reaction. It had more impurities > than the modern version. I do not know anyone who has tried the newer > filter palladium. It might work just as well as the old stuff, or better. I > would like to find out. > > Tanaka Precious Metals might be interested in a cooperative set of > experiments. > > Bear in mind that the procedures described by Storms take considerable > expertise, and a lot of time. About a year. He started with ~100 cathodes > and winnowed out 4 that worked well. (I think it was 4 . . . I am not in my > office so I cannot consult my notes.) These 4 worked consistently and > repeatedly. I think it is fair to say as a result of these tests, > reproducibility increases to 100%. You have to leave behind ~96% of the > starting cathode material, but what you end up with always works. > > As you see in the paper, the winnowing process does not involve simple > trial and error cold fusion electrochemistry. It is as if Storms runs 100 > cells to find 4 that work. He does other diagnostic tests that tell him in > advance whether cathode will or will not work. These tests are similar to > the ones recommended by Cravens. > > - Jed > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
