Dear Ed:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDQQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phy-astr.gsu.edu%2Fstockman%2Fdata%2FStockman_Phys_Today_2011_Physics_behind_Applications.pdf&ei=KWKUUd2bMe610AHSy4CQBQ&usg=AFQjCNHdcmFaRe9tfcLMzk1V8uwPQ8OvXA&sig2=BHsFSNJUGxJ8Cs9T3pBlJA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ


*A primer on Nanoplasmonics.*

The concentration mechanism is a resonant constructive interference process
called Fano interference discovered a few years ago. It produces the “hot
spot”, which is the most significant and exciting process in Nanoplasmonics.

Much current research into hot spots is currently underway.
Laser light is used to produce dipole vibrations in the nanoparticles. A
Laser only produces plain waves and excites dipole excitation poorly.

The lattice of a metal produces dipole vibrations in the deep infrared far
better than a laser ever can.

The Ni/H reactor couples heat with surface electrons to produce polaritons
at high efficiency and then the nano-particles concentrate the EMF in
extreme concentrations.




On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:

> You say this with certainty. Consequently, I assume you do not believe the
> Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law says that all energy goes from a
> higher to a lower level.  You propose the reverse.  If this were true, the
> nano-particles would suddenly get hot for no apparent reason, which would
> be easy to detect. I know of no evidence to show that energy is
> spontaneously concentrated in nano-particles. Do you have such evidence?
>  Please do not use the laser studies because this is not a spontaneous
> effect. The effect results from energy being applied from a high level
> outside of the system.
>
> Ed Storms
>
> On May 15, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> *1. Can energy be concentrated within a material by a spontaneous process?
> *
>
> A nano-particle(s) can concentrate EMF power to a level of *tens of
> terawatts/cm2*. This concentration is long lasting, that is, not pulsed.
>
> That is close to what the National ignition facility can do.
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> 1. Can energy be concentrated within a material by a spontaneous process?
>>> 2. Can this local energy initiate a nuclear reaction?
>>> 3. Can application of energy from any outside source trigger LENR?
>>> 4. Does radiation emitted from the nuclear process fuel additional
>>> nuclear reactions?
>>> 5. Does energetic helium (alpha) result from LENR?
>>>
>>
>> I have no issue with item (1).  I'm just starting to pay more attention
>> to the question of x-rays, that's all.  Unless we're talking about very
>> strong x-rays, I don't think we can conclude much if anything their
>> presence or absence, and particularly in connection with excess heat,
>> without putting some kind of x-ray sensitive film in the system (like they
>> did at BARC).
>>
>> Apart from the small side detail concerning x-rays, I am not disputing
>> your analysis of the likelihood of accelerating electrons to the point of
>> triggering a new kind of electron capture.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to